Sylvester v. Carpenter Paper Company
Decision Date | 23 June 1898 |
Docket Number | 8146 |
Citation | 75 N.W. 1092,55 Neb. 621 |
Parties | ISAAC SYLVESTER v. CARPENTER PAPER COMPANY ET AL |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
ERROR from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before BLAIR, J. Affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Brome Burnett & Jones, for plaintiff in error.
Byron G. Burbank, L. D. Holmes, and E. C. Page, contra.
In January, 1892, Isaac Sylvester, of Omaha, Nebraska, owned a printing outfit on which Marder, Luse & Co., of Chicago, held a chattel mortgage to secure a debt owing to them by Sylvester. At said time there existed in Omaha a corporation known as the Carpenter Paper Company. January 16, in said year, Sylvester, the Carpenter Paper Company, and Marder Luse & Co. signed an agreement in writing, in words and figures as follows: January 22, 1892, Sylvester and the Carpenter Paper Company entered into an agreement in writing as follows: About February 1, 1892, the printing material leased to the Carpenter Paper Company was, by virtue of the writing bearing date January 16, 1892, transferred to its possession, and so remained until taken from them by the writ of replevin issued in this action. About the time the Carpenter Paper Company came into possession of the printing material under its lease Sylvester began work for it and so continued for a few months, when he was discharged or quit. March 5, 1894, Sylvester brought this action in replevin against the Carpenter Paper Company and Marder, Luse & Co. to recover the printing outfit delivered to the Carpenter Paper Company in pursuance of the contract of January 16, 1892. The action was brought, however, within less than twenty-seven months after January 16, 1892. The jury, in obedience to an instruction of the district court, returned a verdict in favor of the parties made defendants, upon which a judgment was entered against Sylvester, to review which he has filed here a petition in error.
1. The evidence shows without conflict that about February 1, 1892, the Carpenter Paper Company, in pursuance of the writing of January 16, 1892, took possession of the printing outfit and remained in possession thereof until this suit was brought, during all of which time it made the monthly payments promised to Marder, Luse & Co. There is no evidence in the record that at the time this suit was brought the debt of Sylvester to Marder, Luse & Co. had been discharged; nor is there any evidence in the record which shows, or tends to show, that Sylvester, at the time this suit was brought, was entitled to the possession of the property in controversy here if the writings of January 16 and 22 constitute the contracts between the parties.
2. On the trial of the case Sylvester offered to prove that in the early part of January, 1892, and prior to the making of these writings, the paper company proposed to him to employ him together with his printing outfit, for twenty-seven months at $ 125 per month, which proposition he accepted; that as a matter of fact there never existed two contracts between himself and the paper company--one contract with reference to leasing the...
To continue reading
Request your trial