Symns v. Noxon
Decision Date | 29 April 1890 |
Citation | 45 N.W. 680,29 Neb. 404 |
Parties | SYMNS v. NOXON. |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Syllabus by the Court.
A decree foreclosing a mortgage on real estate was rendered February 4, 1886. Two orders of sale were issued under this decree, and a return made: “Property not sold for want of bidders.” In June, 1887, a petition to modify the decree was duly filed, and an order made modifying the decree by including property not described in the original decree. No notice of the latter petition was given to the adverse party. A sale of the property described in the latter decree was thereupon had. On a motion being made to set aside the sale because a sale under the modified decree was unauthorized, held, that the modified decree, so far as it changed the original, was a nullity, and the sale thereunder must be set aside.
Appeal from district court, Gage county; BROADY, Judge.A. H. Babcock, for appellant.
R. S. Bibb, for appellee.
On the 4th day of February, 1886, a decree of foreclosure and sale was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs in the district court of Gage county, as follows: On the 10th day of June, 1887, a petition for a further order of said court was filed therein as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hamaker v. Patrick
... ... Bergquist, 9 Neb. 269, 277, 2 N.W. 858; Volland v ... Wilcox, 17 Neb. 46, 22 N.W. 71; Harris v ... State, 24 Neb. 803, 40 N.W. 317; Symns v ... Noxon, 29 Neb. 404, 45 N.W. 680; Bigler v ... Baker, 40 Neb. 325, 58 N.W. 1026; Bradley v ... Slater, 55 Neb. 334, 75 N.W. 826; Young v ... ...
- Symns v. Noxon