Taaffe v. Ryan
| Decision Date | 19 April 1887 |
| Citation | Taaffe v. Ryan, 25 Mo.App. 563 (Mo. App. 1887) |
| Parties | PATRICK J. TAAFFE, Appellant, v. JEREMIAH RYAN, Respondent. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
APPEAL from the St. Louis Circuit Court, GEORGE W. LUBKE, Judge.
Affirmed.
C. C SIMMONS, for the appellant.
FRANK K. RYAN, for the respondent.
The proceeding in this case was instituted by the plaintiff against the defendant, to contest the title of the latter to the office of justice of the peace, for the fifth district of the city of St. Louis, both parties claiming title to the office by virtue of an election held in said district on the second day of November, 1886, the defendant holding the certificate of election.
The plaintiff's petition states facts, which, if proved entitle him to the office; and the only question for decision is, whether the circuit court erred in dismissing the proceeding for want of jurisdiction.
We avail ourselves of the following part of a written opinion filed by the judge of the circuit court, in the case, upon disposing of it, as above stated, because it contains a correct statement of the law, and is a fitting introduction to the few additional observations which we feel called upon to make:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
The State ex rel. Wells v. Hough
... ... 322; Kendall v. U.S., 12 ... Peters 624; Susquehanna Co's. Appeal, 105 Pa. 615; ... Drake v. Gillman, 2 N.Y. 391; Taafe v ... Ryan, 25 Mo.App. 563; State ex rel. v. John, 81 ... Mo. 13; State ex rel. v. Dillon, 87 Mo. 487; ... State ex rel. v. Board of Public Schools, ... ...
-
Felker v. City of Sikeston
...Frank v. Becker, 320 Mo. 1087, 1092, 9 S.W.2d 153, 155; Kehr v. City of Columbia, 136 Mo.App. 322, 330, 116 S.W. 428, 430; Taaffe v. Ryan, 25 Mo.App. 563, 567. It may not be amiss to add parenthetically that, if there is factual foundation for instant contestant's charges, the law affords o......
-
State ex rel. Kelly v. Trimble
...exists only by statutory warrant, and legislative omission to confer jurisdiction cannot be supplied by judicial construction. [Taaffe v. Ryan, 25 Mo.App. 563.] This court has also held that jurisdiction over party is acquired where he is personally served with process within territorial li......
-
Ramsey v. Huck
...these sections county courts are given power to hear and determine contested elections for the office of justice of the peace. [Taaffe v. Ryan, 25 Mo.App. 563.] courts being, therefore, clothed with general power herein, it remains to be determined whether the statute prescribing the proced......