Talbutt v. State

Decision Date16 March 1898
Citation44 S.W. 1091
PartiesTALBUTT v. STATE.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

Appeal from Grayson county court; J. H. Wood, Judge.

J. H. Talbutt was convicted in the county court of pursuing the occupation of a canvasser for the sale of lightning rods without paying the tax, and appeals. Reversed.

Hazlewood & Smith, for appellant. W. W. Walling and Mann Trice, for the State.

DAVIDSON, J.

The offense was committed in January, 1898. The punishment was assessed at a fine of $150. The evidence shows that the appellant was representing Cole Bros., who resided in Greencastle, Putnam county, Ind., and who carried on their business at that place. Cole Bros. have not, and never have had, a place of business within the limits of the state of Texas, and appellant is their agent and representative soliciting orders for the placing of lightning rods on houses in Grayson county, and when the orders are secured they are sent to the place of business of Cole Bros. at Greencastle, Ind. Lightning rods were then made in obedience to said orders, shipped to Texas, and, when required to do so, appellant assisted in placing these lightning rods at the places desired by the purchasers. For this he collected the money for the sale, or took notes, as the case might be. Without going into any discussion of the matter further than heretofore, we hold that the conviction was erroneous. This seems, under the decisions of the supreme court of the United States, to be a tax upon interstate commerce. See Ex parte Holman, 36 Tex. Cr. R. 255, 36 S. W. 441; Brennan v. City of Titusville, 153 U. S. 289, 14 Sup. Ct. 829; Asher v. Texas, 128 U. S. 129; 8 Sup. Ct. 1; Corson v. Maryland, 120 U. S. 502, 7 Sup. Ct. 655; Robbins v. Taxing Dist., 120 U. S. 489, 7 Sup. Ct. 592. The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Belle City Manufacturing Co. v. Frizzell
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • May 9, 1905
    ... ... FRIZZELL Supreme Court of IdahoMay 9, 1905 ... FOREIGN ... CORPORATIONS-DOING BUSINESS WITHIN THIS ... STATE-STATUTE-INTERSTATE COMMERCE-FILING ARTICLES OF ... INCORPORATION-DESIGNATING AGENT UPON WHOM SERVICE OF PROCESS ... MAY BE MADE ... 1. A ... Grande Min. Co., 15 Colo. 499, 22 Am. St. Rep. 433, 25 ... P. 325; Oakland Sugar Mill Co. v. Fred W. Wolfe Co., ... 118 F. 241; Talbutt v. State, 39 Tex. Cr. 64, 73 Am ... St. Rep. 903, 44 S.W. 1091; Bloomington v. Bourland, ... 137 Ill. 534, 31 Am. St. Rep. 382, 27 N.E. 692; 17 ... ...
  • Turner v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • February 28, 1900
    ...business in Texas, to file its articles of incorporation, and receive a permit from the secretary of state. In Talbutt v. State, 39 Tex. Cr. R. 64, 44 S. W. 1091, we held an occupation tax upon the sale of lightning rods manufactured in another state, and sold upon orders taken by traveling......
  • Camp v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • February 13, 1901
    ...protected as interstate commerce, and so not liable to a tax. In support of his contention he cites us to the cases of Talbutt v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 44 S. W. 1091, and French v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 58 S. W. 1015. In both of said cases we endeavored to apply the rule laid down by the su......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT