Tally v. State
| Decision Date | 13 April 1915 |
| Docket Number | 317 |
| Citation | 12 Ala.App. 314,68 So. 567 |
| Parties | TALLY v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; W.W. Haralson, Judge.
Bud Tally was convicted of using abusive, insulting, or obscene language in the presence or hearing of a woman, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded.
Lawrence E. Brown, of Scottsboro, for appellant.
W.L Martin, Atty. Gen., and W.H. Mitchell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
"Whatever be the rule elsewhere, it is well settled in this state that witnesses are not permitted to testify to their motive belief, or intention, when secret and uncommunicated; such mental status, when relevant, being a matter of inference to be determined" by the jury from all the facts and circumstances of the case. Brown v. State, 7 Ala.App. 28, 61 So. 13; Harris v. State, 8 Ala.App 33, 62 So. 477; Hardin v. State, 8 Ala.App. 215, 63 So. 18; McCormick et al. v. Joseph et al., 77 Ala. 240, and cases cited in the report of this case in 48 Ala. Reports Annotated. Consequently, the court committed no error in declining to permit the defendant to testify in his own behalf that he meant nothing offensive by the words that had been attributed to him by the prosecutrix as having been used by him to her on meeting her alone in the road on the occasion in controversy, as this was a question for the jury, to be determined by them from the words used, in the light of the place, facts, and circumstances of their use. Wiley v. State, 10 Ala.App. 249, 65 So. 204; Jackson v. State, 137 Ala. 89, 34 So. 611; Myers v. State, 84 Ala. 11, 4 So. 291.
If the jury believed beyond a reasonable doubt that the words were in fact used and were intended by the defendant as an indecent proposal to the prosecutrix, and that she so understood it, and that such proposal was made without her invitation or consent, then there was no alternative but to convict him, however friendly may have been her previous attitude towards him and however agreeable to her may have been his previous association with her; but, in fixing the amount of the punishment for the offense, which was a matter resting within the sound discretion of the jury, they were entitled to know of her previous friendly attitude towards him and of her previous friendly association with him-- she being a white woman and he a negro man--since we apprehend that ordinarily a jury of reasonable men would not be disposed to inflict as severe a punishment upon a negro man for making an indecent proposal to a white woman when her previous attitude towards him had been such as was calculated to lead one to believe that such proposal might possibly not be resented than when her attitude towards him had been so circumspect that he must surely know that such proposal would be an insult of the highest character and of the gravest magnitude. Golson v....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Yolande Coal & Coke Co. v. Pierce
... ... value of residence and farm properties, [12 Ala.App. 437] and ... it is the settled law in this state that such rights cannot ... be destroyed by a superior riparian proprietor by the ... pollution of the water in a stream to such extent as to ... ...
-
Hutchins v. City of Alexander City
...legally apprehend "lawless patrons" in a local bar, the evidence was sufficient to establish disorderly conduct). Cf. Tally v. State, 12 Ala.App. 314, 68 So. 567 (1915) (in a prosecution for using obscene or insulting language to a woman, a defendant is not permitted to testify that he mean......
- Holcombe v. State