TANKREDERIET GEFION A/S v. Hyman-Michaels Company
Citation | 406 F.2d 1039 |
Decision Date | 10 February 1969 |
Docket Number | No. 19167.,19167. |
Parties | TANKREDERIET GEFION A/S, as Owner of the MOTORSHIP GYDA, Plaintiff, v. HYMAN-MICHAELS COMPANY and Lakes Shipping & Trading Corp., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MICHIGAN FOUNDRY SUPPLY CO., Inc., Erickson Trucking Service, Inc., Third-Party Defendants, and National Cargo Bureau, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee. TANKREDERIET GEFION A/S, as Owner of the MOTORSHIP GYDA, Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN FOUNDRY SUPPLY CO., Inc., Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ERICKSON TRUCKING SERVICE, INC., Third-Party Defendant, and National Cargo Bureau, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee. TANKREDERIET GEFION A/S, as Owner of the MOTORSHIP GYDA, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL CARGO BUREAU, INC., Defendant-Appellee, W. P. Lewis and G. P. Sullivan, Defendants. NATIONAL CARGO BUREAU, INC., Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, W. P. Lewis and G. P. Sullivan, Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. LAKES SHIPPING AND TRADING CORPORATION, an Illinois Corporation, Hyman-Michaels Company, an Illinois Corporation, Michigan Foundry Supply Co., Inc., a Michigan Corporation, Third-Party Defendants-Appellants, and Erickson Trucking Service, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, Third-Party Defendant. The TOKIO MARINE & FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Ltd., a foreign corporation, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HYMAN-MICHAELS COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation, and Michigan Foundry Supply Company, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NATIONAL CARGO BUREAU, Inc., a New York Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee, and Erickson Trucking Service, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, Third-Party Defendant. |
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit) |
Thomas E. Byrne, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., Krusen, Evans & Byrne, Philadelphia, Pa., Lucking & Miller, Donald J. Miller, Detroit, Mich., on brief for Hyman-Michaels Co. and Lakes Shipping et al.
Leroy G. Vandeveer, Detroit, Mich., Achtenberg, Sandler & Balkin, Irving Achtenberg, Kansas City, Mo., Alexander, Buchanan & Conklin, Richard A. Harvey, Detroit, Mich., Vandeveer, Doelle, Garzia, Tonkin & Kerr, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for Michigan Foundry Supply Co.
David V. Martin, Detroit, Mich., Martin Bohall, Joselyn, Halsey & Rowe, Detroit, Mich., on brief for appellee, National Cargo Bureau.
Before O'SULLIVAN, EDWARDS and McCREE, Circuit Judges,
Appellants Hyman-Michaels Co. and Michigan Foundry Supply Co. appeal on leave granted from an interlocutory order entered by a District Judge in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. The order was entered during trial of eleven cases arising out of a spontaneous combustion fire in a load of steel scrap which damaged both the cargo and the ship in which it was being transported to Japan.
After close of plaintiffs' proofs and the taking of considerable testimony from defendants, appellants principal defendants in the trial entered into a settlement with plaintiffs Tankrederiet Gefion A/S, as owner of the Motorship GYDA, and Mitsubishi, a Japanese trading company, owner of the cargo. Subsequently, as the trial continued, on appellants' complaints against third-party defendant National Cargo Bureau, which had been filed under Rule 14(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, National Cargo Bureau objected to plaintiffs' tender of proofs concerning the prudence and reasonableness of their settlement. Thereupon after extensive argument the District Judge entered the following order:
It is this order from which the interlocutory appeal is taken.
This appeal is heard upon the following stipulation of facts:
Although not included in the stipulation above, an additional fact crucial to our decision is cited in appellee's brief in this appeal, is not denied in appellants' briefs, and was conceded by appellants at oral hearing. This is the fact that, although appellee had full notice of the litigation and was interpleaded as a party thereto, and further, was notified of the settlement negotiation and invited to participate therein, appellants did not prior to settlement seek appellee's approval or tender the defense of this action to appellee in exchange for a hold-harmless agreement.
In this case the appellants (the original defendants, henceforth B) settled the claim of the original plaintiffs, A, without first tendering the defense to the appellee (the third-party defendant, C) in...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Western Steamship Lines, Inc. v. San Pedro Peninsula Hospital
...[the indemnitor's] money without the final judgment of a court or [the indemnitor's] agreement." (Tankrederiet Gefion A/S v. Hyman-Michaels Company (6th Cir.1969) 406 F.2d 1039, 1043-1044; see also Breese v. Price, supra, 29 Cal.3d at p. 931, 176 Cal.Rptr. 791, 633 P.2d 987.) In this case, ......
-
In re Air Crash at Detroit Metro. Airport
...underlying action." Proctor, 624 F.2d at 775 (citing Knickerbocher v. Wilcox, 83 Mich.App. 200 (1890); Tankrederiet Gefion A/S v. Hyman-Michaels Company, 406 F.2d 1039 (6th Cir.1969)). However, MDC relies upon a "potential liability" exception by which a settling party need not show actual ......
-
Air Crash Disaster, In re
...underlying action") (citing Knickerbocker v. Wilcox, 83 Page 549 Mich. 200, 47 N.W. 123 (1890)); see also Tankrederiet Gefion A/S v. Hyman-Michaels Co., 406 F.2d 1039 (6th Cir.1969). Because McDonnell Douglas was exonerated of liability by the jury, McDonnell Douglas had no actual liability......
-
Valloric v. Dravo Corp.
...106 (2d Cir.1986); Whisenant v. Brewster-Bartle Offshore Co., 446 F.2d 394, 402-03 (5th Cir.1971); Tankrederiet Gefion A/S v. Hyman-Michaels Co., 406 F.2d 1039, 1042-44 (6th Cir.1969); Ford Motor Co. v. W.F. Holt & Sons, Inc., 335 F.Supp. 775 (M.D.Tenn.1971). This was also true in Ashland O......