Tapp v. N.Y. Urban Dev. Corp.

Decision Date31 January 2013
Citation958 N.Y.S.2d 392,102 A.D.3d 620,2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 00547
PartiesTyler N. TAPP, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. NEW YORK STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, etc., et al., Defendants–Appellants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Dopf, P.C., New York (Martin B. Adams of counsel), for appellants.

Sacks & Sacks, LLP, New York (Scott N. Singer of counsel), for respondent.

GONZALEZ, P.J., FRIEDMAN, MOSKOWITZ, DeGRASSE, FREEDMAN, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saliann Scarpulla, J.), entered March 8, 2012, which, in this personal injury action, denied defendants' motion to compel an authorization for plaintiff's Facebook records compiled after the incident alleged in the complaint, including any records previously deleted or archived, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly determined that plaintiff's mere possession and utilization of a Facebook account is an insufficient basis to compel plaintiff to provide access to the account or to have the court conduct an in camera inspection of the account's usage. To warrant discovery, defendants must establish a factual predicate for their request by identifying relevant information in plaintiff's Facebook account—that is, information that “contradicts or conflicts with plaintiff's alleged restrictions, disabilities, and losses, and other claims” ( Patterson v. Turner Constr. Co., 88 A.D.3d 617, 618, 931 N.Y.S.2d 311 [1st Dept.2011];see Kregg v. Maldonado, 98 A.D.3d 1289, 1290, 951 N.Y.S.2d 301 [4th Dept.2012] ). Defendants failed to identify relevant information.

Defendants' argument that plaintiff's Facebook postings “may reveal daily activities that contradict or conflict with” plaintiff's claim of disability amounts to nothing more than a request for permission to conduct a “fishing expedition” ( see e.g. McCann v. Harleysville Ins. Co. of N.Y., 78 A.D.3d 1524, 910 N.Y.S.2d 614 [4th Dept.2010] ).

We have considered defendants' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Forman v. Henkin
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 17, 2015
    ...in the context of discovery requests seeking a party's social media information. For example, in Tapp v. New York State Urban Dev. Corp., 102 A.D.3d 620, 958 N.Y.S.2d 392 (1st Dept.2013), we denied the defendants' request for an authorization for the plaintiff's Facebook records, concluding......
  • Forman v. Henkin
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • February 13, 2018
    ...unclear precisely what standard the Appellate Division applied, it cited its prior decision in Tapp v. New York State Urban Dev. Corp., 102 A.D.3d 620, 958 N.Y.S.2d 392 [1st Dept. 2013] ), which stated: "To warrant discovery, defendants must establish a factual predicate for their request b......
  • Renaissance Equity Holdings LLC v. Webber
    • United States
    • New York Civil Court
    • July 27, 2018
    ...is sought]" (see Richards v. Hertz Corp. , 100 A.D.3d 728, 953 N.Y.S.2d 654 [2d Dept. 2012] ; Tapp v. New York State Urban Dev. Corp , 102 A.D.3d 620, 958 N.Y.S.2d 392 [1st Dept. 2013] ; Kregg v. Maldonado , 98 A.D.3d 1289, 1290, 951 N.Y.S.2d 301 [4th Dept. 2012] ). Moreover, parties were r......
  • Melissa G v. N. Babylon Union Free Sch. Dist.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • March 18, 2015
    ...conflicts with plaintiff's alleged restrictions, disabilities, and losses, and other claims” (Tapp v. New York State Urban Dev'mt Corp., 102 A.D.3d 620, 621, 958 N.Y.S.2d 392 [1st Dept.2013], quoting Patterson v. Turner Constr. Co., 88 A.D.3d at 618, 931 N.Y.S.2d 311 ). Indeed, the Courts o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Discovery tactics to maximize damages
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Proving Damages to the Jury Part 3
    • May 4, 2022
    ...A client’s social media account may not be discoverable simply because the account exists. Tapp v. N.Y. St. Urban Dev. Corp. , 102 A.D. 3d 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)(“[M]ere possession and utilization of a Facebook account is an insufficient basis to compel [the party] to provide access to t......
  • Discovery tactics to maximize damages
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Proving Damages to the Jury - 2020 Part 3: How to prepare the damage case for trial
    • August 5, 2020
    ...A client’s social media account may not be discoverable simply because the account exists. Tapp v. N.Y. St. Urban Dev. Corp. , 102 A.D. 3d 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)(“[M]ere possession and utilization of a Facebook account is an insu൶cient basis to compel [the party] to provide access to the......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT