Tate v. Tate, 82-1280

Decision Date18 May 1983
Docket NumberNo. 82-1280,82-1280
Citation432 So.2d 601
PartiesJoni TATE, Appellant, v. George Thomas TATE, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Ronald E. Jones of Ronald E. Jones, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ronald Sales of Sales & Weissman, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is a dissolution of marriage case which we summarily address inasmuch as there is nothing novel to be found in the facts or law involved.

Using the guidelines found in Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980) and McAllister v. McAllister, 345 So.2d 352 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) we reverse or adjust these portions of the final judgment which provided:

4. The husband be and he hereby is enjoined and required to pay the wife periodic alimony in the amount of $580.00 per month, the first payment to be paid on June 1, 1982 and like payments to be paid on the same day of each month until the court may enter an order terminating those payments. It is not the court's intention that the wife have permanent periodic alimony. After the marital homeplace is sold and the amount of proceeds realized by the wife is known, the court will consider the husband's application that the alimony be terminated and will terminate it or fix the period during which it is payable. That application may be made on motion after notice.

9. The wife be and she hereby is awarded exclusive possession of the marital homeplace and the lot adjacent to it, more particularly described as:

Lot 66, Island Estates, Addition No. 1, Palm Beach County, Florida Public Records,

and

Lot 67, Island Estates, Addition No. 1, Palm Beach County, Florida Public Records.

The parties shall expose the marital homeplace and the lot adjacent to it for sale at the earliest possible time. They shall do all things reasonably required to effect the sale of it at some fair price. Pending the sale, the wife shall pay all of the mortgage payments. The unpaid mortgage balances on the 1979 and 1980 Monte Carlo automobiles as they now are shall be reimbursed to the husband and paid to the mortgagees from the net sales proceeds and the balance of the net sales proceeds shall be equally divided. Net sales proceeds means the amount realized after payment of all costs and expenses of sale, excluding the parties' attorneys' fees involved with the sale which they shall pay themselves.

This is a twenty-five year marriage which produced two children, one of whom is a minor residing with the wife. The wife is unemployed with substantial needs. Due to the sharp disparity between the parties...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Brandt v. Brandt, 4-86-1881
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 1, 1988
    ...v. Whiteley, 329 So.2d 352, 353 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). See also Wertheimer v. Wertheimer, 487 So.2d 90 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Tate v. Tate, 432 So.2d 601 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Price v. Price, 389 So.2d 666 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), rev. denied, 397 So.2d 778 (Fla.1981); Guthrie v. Guthrie, 315 So.2d 49......
  • Tinsley v. Tinsley, 85-2223
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 24, 1986
    ...to whether the spouse who pays the mortgage is to receive credit, the right to a credit arises by operation of law. Cf. Tate v. Tate, 432 So.2d 601 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (no dispute that spouse entitled to credit; however, court remanded to have right to credit made explicit in judgment). Tho......
  • Adams v. Adams, 83-2122
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 27, 1985
    ...court should have awarded the $600 per month as permanent, periodic alimony. Walter v. Walter, 464 So.2d 538 (Fla.1985); Tate v. Tate, 432 So.2d 601 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); King v. King, 420 So.2d 630 (Fla. 4th DCA The checking account should not have been divided between the parties. No speci......
  • Linn v. Linn
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 27, 1985
    ...periodic alimony proper where husband owned substantial property and wife could expect to earn only minimal salary); Tate v. Tate, 432 So.2d 601 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (wife entitled to permanent periodic alimony in light of sharp disparity in parties' education, income and earning capacity); ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT