Tatum v. State, 99-2411.

Decision Date13 October 1999
Docket NumberNo. 99-2411.,99-2411.
Citation741 So.2d 1266
PartiesLorenzo TATUM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Lorenzo Tatum, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, GODERICH and FLETCHER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Lorenzo Tatum appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). He argues that he was a juvenile at the time he pled guilty to second degree murder and other crimes in 1993, and contends that his sentence is illegal because the sentencing court did not make findings regarding the necessity of adult sanctions. See § 39.059(7)(d), Fla. Stat. (1991). We reject that claim on authority of Summers v. State, 684 So.2d 729 (Fla.1996). We find no merit to appellant's remaining points and reject them without discussion.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Tatum v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 20 Enero 2010
    ...684 So.2d 729 (Fla.1996). We find no merit to appellant's remaining points and reject them without discussion. Affirmed. Tatum v. State, 741 So.2d 1266, 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (emphasis Undeterred, in June of 2005, Tatum filed yet another Rule 3.800 motion. This motion, like the last, clai......
  • Romero v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 15 Octubre 1999

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT