Tave v. State, 53615
| Decision Date | 02 February 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 53615,53615 |
| Citation | 546 S.W.2d 317 |
| Parties | Kenneth Smith TAVE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. |
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
DALLY, Commissioner.
The appellant was convicted for driving a motor vehicle while his operator's license was suspended. The punishment assessed by the court, after the appellant entered a plea of guilty, was confinement in the County Jail for 72 hours and a fine of $50.00.
The appellant asserts that the information on which he was prosecuted was fatally defective because it failed to allege whether his operator's license was suspended under the provisions of Article 6687b or Article 6701h of V.A.C.S.
The information, in pertinent part, alleges that the appellant '. . . did then and there unlawfully drive and operate a motor vehicle upon a public highway, there situate, when the Texas Operator's License of the said Kenneth Smith Tave, was suspended; against the peace and dignity of the State.'
While similar pleading was held proper in Rushing v. State, 161 Tex.Cr.R. 334, 277 S.W.2d 104 (1955); Gregg v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 202, 339 S.W.2d 539 (1960), it was held vulnerable to timely motion to quash in Adams v. State, 376 S.W.2d 832 (Tex.Cr.App.1964); Cox v. State, 380 S.W.2d 121 (Tex.Cr.App.1964), and Deramee v. State, 379 S.W.2d 908 (Tex.Cr.App.1964). It appears that this Court has not yet determined whether such a pleading is fundamentally defective when a timely motion to quash the pleading had not been filed.
Article 6687b, Sec. 22(b), V.A.C.S., provides for the suspension of an operator's license for numerous reasons; included are suspension for habitual violation of the less serious traffic laws and automatic suspension for more serious violations of traffic laws.
Section 34 of Article 6687b, V.A.C.S., provides:
'Any person whose operator's commercial operator's or chauffeur's license or driving privilege as a non-resident has been cancelled, suspended, or revoked as provided in this Act, and who drives any motor vehicle upon the highways of this State while such license or privilege is cancelled, suspended, or revoked is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be punished by fine of not less than Twenty-five Dollars ($25) nor more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500), and, in addition, there shall be imposed a sentence of imprisonment of not less than seventy-two (72) hours nor more than six (6) months.'
Article 6701h, V.A.C.S., The Safety Responsibility Act, provides in Sections 5, 7, 13, and 14 for the suspension of Texas Operator's Licenses for the failure to comply with the Act.
Section 32(c) provides 'Any person whose license or registration or non-resident's operating privilege has been suspended or revoked under this Act and who, during such suspension or revocation drives any motor vehicle upon any highway or knowingly...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Benoit v. State, s. 54296-54300
...sought to be alleged. We conclude that the judgment of the conviction based thereupon is void, rather than voidable." In Tave v. State, 546 S.W.2d 317 (Tex.Cr.App.1977), it was held that information charging the offense of driving while license suspended was fatally defective for failing to......
-
Drumm v. State
...24, supra, under which his license was suspended deprived him of sufficient notice upon which to prepare his defense. In Tave v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 546 S.W.2d 317, 318, we "(I)n the prosecution of a defendant for driving a motor vehicle while his operator's license is suspended it is neces......
-
Offenses against public health, safety, and morals
...grounds for suspending the license. The pleader must specify the subsection that covers the accused’s suspension. Tave v. State , 546 S.W.2d 317 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997); Drumm v. State , 560 S.W.2d 944 (Tex.Crim.App. 1977). §11:1110 “Operator’s License” The evidence at trial must establish tha......