Taverno v. American Auto Ins. Co. et al.
Decision Date | 11 February 1938 |
Docket Number | No. 18988.,18988. |
Citation | 112 S.W.2d 941 |
Parties | BENJAMIN TAVERNO, JR., APPELLANT, v. AMERICAN AUTO INSURANCE CO. ET AL., RESPONDENTS. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County. — Hon. A.A. Ridge, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Robert L. Holder for appellant.
Harding, Murphy & Tucker for respondents.
This case is before us for review on an appeal from the action of the trial court in sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff's petition and entering judgment for defendants.
The first paragraph of plaintiff's petition describes both parties, plaintiff and defendants, and alleges that defendants Pierson and Garver acted in all matters declared upon as the agent of the Auto Insurance company.
In paragraph No. 2, plaintiff alleges issuance of policy of insurance by the defendant company to one R. Richard Fitzgerald whereby under the terms of the policy it held the said Fitzgerald harmless against claim or judgment for liability for his negligence, or violation of law in the operation of his automobile, and agreed to defend him in any action brought, and agreed to pay any claim or judgment. The company further reserved the right to settle or compromise any claim or cause of action against him, all under the terms of the policy while same was in full force and effect.
The third paragraph of plaintiff's petition is as follows:
"Plaintiff states that on the said February 15th, 1936, a meritorious claim and cause of action accrued to him against the said R. Richard Fitzgerald by reason of the said R. Richard Fitzgerald's negligent and unlawful operation of his said Cadillac automobile as hereinafter set out, and which claim and cause of action defendant American Auto Insurance Company was, by its said policy, bound to pay and defend."
Following paragraph No. 3, the plaintiff pleads facts of negligence on the part of Fitzgerald resulting in injury to a car owned by plaintiff. In other words plaintiff pleads a good cause of action as against Fitzgerald.
Plaintiff in paragraphs No. 7, 8, 9, and 10 of his petition states that Fitzgerald told him that he (Fitzgerald) was at fault and that he was insured by the defendant, American Auto Insurance Company, and that he would report the accident and that said company would pay the damages. Further, it is plead that said Fitzgerald did report the accident to each of the defendants. Further, plaintiff alleges the nature, extent and amount of damages claimed.
After the above narration of alleged facts and circumstances, the plaintiff pleads against all defendants as follows:
Defendants file demurrer to plaintiff's petition alleging that no cause of action is stated against either of the defendants.
Upon court sustaining the demurrer and plaintiff refusing to plead...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Faught v. Washam
...956, 211 S.W.2d 489, 492. See also Cotton v. Iowa Mut. Liab. Ins. Co., 363 Mo. 400, 251 S.W.2d 246, 249, and Taverno v. American Auto Ins. Co., 232 Mo.App. 820, 112 S.W.2d 941, 944.7 See DeCarlucci v. Brasley, 16 N.J.Super. 48, 83 A.2d 823, 825, where counsel for plaintiff's insurer identif......
-
Macey v. Crum
... ... state. Home Ins. Co. v. Dick, 281 U.S. 397, 50 S.Ct ... 338, 74 L.Ed. 926, 74 A.L.R ... 433, 138 A. 186; 11 ... Am.Jur. 454, § 154; contra: Rogers v. American Employers ... Ins. Co., D.C.La., 61 F.Supp. 142 ... Employers' Liability Assur ... Corporation, supra; Continental Auto Ins. Underwriters v ... Menuskin, 222 Ala. 370, 132 So. 883. The ... Co. v. Skinner, 190 Miss ... 533, 1 So.2d 225, 226; Taverno v. American Auto Ins ... Co., 232 Mo.App. 820, 112 S.W.2d 941; Lajoie v ... ...
-
Brillhart v. Excess Ins Co of America
...Underwriters, 326 Mo. 92, 31 S.W.2d 7; Lajoie v. Central West Casualty Co., 228 Mo.App. 701, 71 S.W.2d 803; Taverno v. American Auto Ins. Co., 232 Mo.App. 820, 112 S.W.2d 941. The problem is whether by reason of the insurer's liability under the policy and the statute, and respondent's liab......
-
McNeal v. Manchester Ins. & Indem. Co.
...insured can proceed by garnishment of funds in the hands of the insurance company to collect the claim. Taverno v. American Auto Ins. Co., 232 Mo.App. 820, 112 S.W.2d 941, 944 (1938); (2) conditions of an automobile liability policy requiring notice to be given to an insurance carrier as so......