Taylor v. Bostic
Decision Date | 31 October 1885 |
Citation | 93 N.C. 415 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | SARAH TAYLOR v. G. T. BOSTIC, Ex'r. |
SPECIAL PROCEEDING, heard on an agreed statement of the facts by Philips, Judge, at Spring Term, 1885, of the Superior Court of RUTHERFORD county.
This was a special proceeding brought by the plaintiff as widow of W. W. Taylor, against the defendant as his executor, for a year's allowance out of his personal estate. The case was commenced before the clerk, and transferred by him to the civil issue docket of the Superior Court for the county of Rutherford, and was there heard and determined before Philips, Judge, upon the following state of facts agreed:
Sarah Taylor, the plaintiff, and one W. W. Taylor, were married in the year 1852, and she lived and cohabited with him until 1856, when they were divorced by the decree of the Superior Court for said county, a mensa et thoro, which was as follows:
The parties lived separate and apart until the death of the said W. W. Taylor in the year 1883. The amount stipulated in the decree to be paid to Sarah Taylor by W. W. Taylor was paid.
W. W. Taylor left a last will and testament, in which the defendant was made his executor, and has qualified as such, and entered upon the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Medlin v. N.C. Specialty Hosp., LLC
...under most authorities, support an appeal or writ of error. There is case authority in North Carolina for this rule. In Taylor v. Bostic, 93 N.C. 415 (1885) the trial court entered a written statement of his opinion, but no order or judgment was entered. The North Carolina Supreme Court hel......
-
Rogerson v. Greenleaf Johnson Lumber Co
...which are to the same effect: Commissioners v. Satchwell, 88 N. C. 1; Lutz v. Cline, 89 N. C. 186; Jones v. Call, 89 N. C. 188; Taylor v. Bostic, 93 N. C. 415; Arrington v. Arrington, 91 N. C. 301. The law does not confer upon parties who differ as to the law of their case the right to prop......
-
Dowdy v. Dowdy
...would lie. [1] But as no judgment was rendered, no appeal can be entertained. Clark's Code (3d Ed.) § 548, and cases cited; Taylor v. Bostic, 93 N. C. 415. [2] While the appeal must be dismissed as premature, in the exercise of our discretion, we will consider the question presented. State ......
-
Rogerson v. Greenleaf-Johnson Lumber Co.
... ... the same effect: Commissioners v. Satchwell, 88 N.C ... 1; Lutz v. Cline, 89 N.C. 186; Jones v ... Call, 89 N.C. 188; Taylor v. Bostic, 93 N.C ... 415; Arrington v. Arrington, 91 N.C. 301. The law ... does not confer upon parties who differ as to the law of ... their ... ...