Taylor v. Collins and Ryan, Inc.
Decision Date | 30 December 1981 |
Parties | Carl TAYLOR, Appellant, v. COLLINS AND RYAN, INC., Appellee. |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Delaware |
Upon appeal from Superior Court. Appeal dismissed.
John J. Schmittinger, of Schmittinger & Rodriguez, Dover, for appellant.
Robert W. Ralston, of Prickett, Jones, Elliott, Kristol & Schnee, Wilmington, for appellee.
Before HERRMANN, C. J., DUFFY and McNEILLY, JJ.
In this case, which arises under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 19 Del.C. § 2301, the Superior Court entered an order of remand to the Industrial Accident Board with instructions to take further testimony, including expert medical testimony, on the issue as to when disfigurement of the claimant became permanent. Thereafter, the employee docketed this appeal.
Clearly, an order of remand by the Superior Court to the Industrial Accident Board is an interlocutory and not a final order. And under settled Delaware law such an order is not appealable to this Court. Cicamore v. Alloy Surfaces Company, Del.Supr., 244 A.2d 278 (1968); McClelland v. General Motors Corporation, Del.Supr., 214 A.2d 847 (1965).
After those cases were decided, this Court adopted Rule 42 which specifies the procedure governing interlocutory appeals. But that Rule did not change nor modify the decisions in Cicamore and McClelland. Indeed, the Rule codifies those and similar decisions and adds additional requirements which have not been met in this appeal.
It follows, therefore, that the appeal must be dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Potter v. Del. Dep't of Corr.
...at *2 (Del. Super. Ct. Mar. 24, 2008)). 10. Id. 11. Id. 12. Id. (quoting Stanley, 2008 WL 2410212, at *2). 13. Taylor v. Collins and Ryan, Inc., 440 A.2d 990, 990 (Del. 1981) (citing Cicamore v. Alloy Surfaces Co., 244 A.2d 278 (Del. 1968); McClelland v. General Motors Corp., 214 A.2d 847 (......
-
Wade v. Greggo & Ferrara, Inc.
...of the case to the Industrial Accident Board, DiSabatino Bros., Inc. v. Wortman, Del.Supr., 453 A.2d 102 (1982); Taylor v. Collins and Ryan, Inc., Del.Supr., 440 A.2d 990 (1981); and appellant having failed to comply with the procedural requirements of Rule 42(c) and NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS O......
-
Christiana Care Health, Servs., Inc. v. Luce, C.A. N16A-10-002 AML
...is different than one in which the Court remands the matter to an administrative agency for further proceedings. See Taylor v. Collins & Ryan, Inc., 440 A.2d 990 (Del. 1981) (holding an order of remand by the Superior Court to the Industrial Accident Board is interlocutory). On the other ha......
- Julian v. State ex rel. Secretary of Dept. of Transp.