Taylor v. Judsonia Mercantile Co.
Decision Date | 01 July 1892 |
Citation | 19 S.W. 1065,56 Ark. 461 |
Parties | TAYLOR v. JUDSONIA MERCANTILE COMPANY |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
APPEAL from White Circuit Court, MATTHEW T. SANDERS, Judge.
Geo Taylor & Co. interpleaded in an attachment suit brought by Kraft-Holmes Grocer Co. against the Judsonia Mercantile Co. a corporation engaged in merchandising.
The agreed statement of facts disclosed substantially the following state of case: In April and May, 1887, the Judsonia Mercantile Co., for the purpose of securing Geo. Taylor & Co. for advances to be made, gave them twenty-one notes aggregating over $ 1,300; said notes were made by different debtors of the company for various sums, and fell due about November 1, 1887, and were endorsed to Geo. Taylor & Co. In September, 1887, the company, being insolvent, executed a deed of trust, conveying all of their corporate property including the notes above mentioned, to Geo. W. Hanson, as trustee, for the benefit of certain preferred creditors including Geo. Taylor & Co. Subsequently the Kraft-Holmes Grocer Co. and certain other non-preferred creditors brought suits at law against the Judsonia Mercantile Co. and procured attachments to be levied upon its property. Upon the application of certain creditors preferred by the deed of trust, the chancery court appointed Hanson receiver of the property conveyed by the deed of trust. The appointment of the receiver was successfully resisted by the attaching creditors, this court holding that equity had no jurisdiction (Ford v. Judsonia Mercantile Co., 52 Ark. 426). The receiver, under the court's orders, paid over to the sheriff all funds collected by him, including the sum of $ 616.80 collected upon the twenty one notes above mentioned and still held by Geo. Taylor & Co. The attachments were sustained by the circuit court. At the time the attachments were sued out, the Judsonia Mercantile Co. was indebted to Geo. Taylor & Co. in the sum of $ 2,484.46, to secure the payment of which the twenty-one notes were still held.
The question in the case is, whether Geo. Taylor & Co. should receive the proceeds of these twenty-one notes or whether they should go into the general fund for the attaching creditors? Upon this point evidence was taken from which the court found the following facts: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Stifft v. Stiewel
...Dec. 79; 44 Mass. 155; 3 Mont. 527; 23 Am. Rep. 99; 21 Ark. 18; 52 Ark. 174; 54 Ark 185; 66 Ark. 550; Id. 26; 55 Ark. 369; 33 Ark. 215; 56 Ark. 461. In order to take the contract the sale of the stock out of the operation of the statute of frauds, there must have been some act of a characte......
- Stiewel v. Webb Press Co.
- Taylor v. Judsonia Mercantile Co.