Taylor v. Mitchell, 99-2069.
| Decision Date | 17 May 2000 |
| Docket Number | No. 99-2069.,99-2069. |
| Citation | 88 Ohio St.3d 453,727 NE 2d 905 |
| Parties | TAYLOR, APPELLANT, v. MITCHELL, WARDEN, APPELLEE. |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
Gerald Taylor, pro se.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Michele M. Schoeppe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Any defect caused by the alleged failure to file criminal complaints or the claimed impropriety of the municipal court's assumption of jurisdiction over the rape charges is not cognizable in habeas corpus. Taylor was convicted and sentenced upon an indictment regularly issued, and the common pleas court had jurisdiction to try, convict, and sentence him on the charged offenses. See State ex rel. Dozier v. Mack (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 368, 369, 708 N.E.2d 712, 713; see, also, Simpson v. Maxwell (1964), 1 Ohio St.2d 71, 30 O.O.2d 40, 203 N.E.2d 324; Orr v. Mack (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 429, 430, 700 N.E.2d 590, 591 ().1
Judgment affirmed.
1. Taylor waived the additional claims he raises on appeal by failing to raise them in the court of appeals. Brown v. Leonard (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 593, 716 N.E.2d 183.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Green v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.
...N.E.2d 49, at ¶ 5. citing Harris v. Bagley, 97 Ohio St.3d 98, 2002-0hio-5369, 776 N.E.2d 490 at ¶ 3, quoting Taylor v. Mitchell (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 453, 454, 727 N.E.2d 905. Further, Green entered into a plea agreement with the State whereby the originally charged and indicted offenses we......
- State ex rel. Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas
-
State ex rel. Rackley v. Sloan
...over [criminal] charges.’ " Harris v. Bagley, 97 Ohio St.3d 98, 2002-Ohio-5369, 776 N.E.2d 490, ¶ 3, quoting Taylor v. Mitchell, 88 Ohio St.3d 453, 454, 727 N.E.2d 905 (2000). " ‘The manner by which an accused is charged with a crime is procedural rather than jurisdictional, and after a con......
-
Harris v. Sowers
...to the Ohio Supreme Court from the decision of the court of appealsdenying his habeas petition was one of right. See Taylor v. Mitchell, 88 Ohio St.3d 453 (2000). However, this court agrees with the remainder of the magistrate judge's analysis of this claim. First, the magistrate judge note......