Taylor v. Sanford
Decision Date | 04 April 1917 |
Docket Number | (No. 2483.) |
Citation | 193 S.W. 661 |
Parties | TAYLOR v. SANFORD. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Suit by J. M. Sanford, as administrator of the estate of R. H. Sanford, deceased, against Annie Lee Taylor, to cancel a deed. Judgment for the plaintiff was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals (150 S. W. 262), and defendant brings error. Reversed, and judgment entered for defendant.
A. S. Rollins, of Amarillo, and J. C. Hunt, of Canyon, for plaintiff in error. Madden, Trulove & Kimbrough, of Amarillo, for defendant in error.
The suit was by J. M. Sanford, administrator of the estate of R. H. Sanford, deceased, to cancel a deed of R. H. Sanford to Annie Lee Taylor conveying certain property in Canyon, Texas. The deed was executed and acknowledged by R. H. Sanford on June 14, 1911. It recited that Miss Taylor was to assume the payment of three vendor's lien notes against the property, aggregating $750.00, principal, and that a part of its consideration was the conveyance by Miss Taylor to Sanford of a lot in the town of Hamlin, in Jones County, and a 40 acre tract of land in Presidio County. Sanford was the sheriff and tax collector of Randall County. Miss Taylor was his office clerk and stenographer. There was evidence tending to show that Sanford and she had been engaged to be married. She had loaned Sanford some of her private means, which had not been repaid. Sanford was due the State of Texas and Randall County approximately $1000.00 for taxes which he had collected and for which he had not accounted, and was in a state of some financial embarrassment. He committed suicide on June 15, 1911, the day following his execution of the deed to Miss Taylor.
After executing the deed on June 14, Sanford immediately filed it for record in the office of the County Clerk, and, on the same day, following its record, mailed it to Miss Taylor who at that time was visiting her home in another county of the State. He likewise immediately mailed her in the same or a separate enclosure two deeds for her execution conveying to him the lot in Hamlin and the tract of land in Presidio County, mentioned in his deed to her. Accompanying the deed to Miss Taylor was the following letter from Sanford addressed to her.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Moore v. Van Tassell Real Estate & Live Stock Company
... ... 210; Phillips v. Plastridge, 99 A. L. R. 1074. The ... gift was accepted by the donee. In re Stockham, ... (Ia.) 186 N.W. 650; Taylor v. Sanford, (Texas) ... 193 S.W. 661; In re Donohoe, 115 A. 878; ... McKinnon v. Bank, 6 A. L. R. 111. Draper was a ... trustee for donee ... ...
-
Bibby v. Bibby, 3611.
...accepted the conveyance. The controlling question upon both of these issues is the intention of the parties. Taylor v. Sanford, 108 Tex. 340, 193 S.W. 661, 5 A.L.R. 1660; Hubbard v. Cox, 76 Tex. 239, 13 S.W. 170; Tyler B. & L. Ass'n v. Baird & Seales, Tex.Civ. App., 165 S.W. In this case on......
-
Pemelton v. Pemelton
...the encumbrance. Kiel v. Brinkman, 668 S.W.2d 926, 929 (Tex.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1984, no writ); see also Taylor v. Sanford, 108 Tex. 340, 193 S.W. 661, 662 (1917); Van v. Webb, 237 S.W.2d 827, 832 (Tex.Civ.App.--Amarillo 1951, writ ref'd Specifically, Charlotte asserts that conveyanc......
-
First State Bank v. Bland
...fact a delivery is a question usually for the jury to determine. Henry v. Phillips, 105 Tex. 459, 151 S. W. 533; Taylor v. Sanford, 108 Tex. 340, 193 S. W. 661, 5 A. L. R. 1660; Williams v. Moore, 24 Tex. Civ. App. 402, 58 S. W. 953. Where a deed is executed and placed of record by the gran......