Taylor v. Smith
Decision Date | 19 March 1895 |
Citation | 116 N.C. 531,21 S.E. 202 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | TAYLOR . v. SMITH. |
Agreement between Joint Owners—Provision for Survivorship—Gift — Conflicting Findings — Construction of Contract — "Livino Heir."
1. A verbal agreement between two parties holding a note payable to them jointly, that upon the death of either without living issue it shall belong to the survivor, is valid.
2. Code, § 1326, abolishing survivorship in estates held in joint tenancy, does not prohibit contracts making the rights of the parties dependent on survivorship.
3. When the jury have found that a contract existed between two sisters, whereby the survivor should have the whole of certain property owned by them jointly, a second finding that one of the parties at a later date made a gift of her share in such joint property to the other is not inconsistent with the first.
4. In a contract between two sisters, providing that, should either of them die before the other without a "living heir." the survivor should become sole owner of a note held by them jointly, the words "living heir" should be construed to mean "issue."
Appeal from superior court, Greene county; Brown, Judge.
Action by G. W. Taylor, administrator, against Addie O. Smith. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
The material portions of the testimony were as follows: George M. Smith testified for the defendant: "I executed the note for seven hundred dollars." Said witness further testified: Deposition of Talitha Smith is offered in evidence, which is as follows: "
Issues:
J. B. Batchelor, for appellant.
Geo. M. Lindsay, for appellee.
AVERY, J. Two sisters, the plaintiff's intestate and the defendant, "agreed with each other that, should either of them die before the other without a living heir, the survivor should have" a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Equitable Loan & Sec. Co. v. Waring
... ... The multiple table does not, but ... skips according to a sort of geometrical progression ... Candler & Thomson, Hoke Smith, H. C. Peeples, Rosser & Brandon, H. E ... W. Palmer, and E. W. Butler, for plaintiffs in error ... G. T. & J. F. Cann, Jno. L ... Cable, 114 Pa. 586, 7 A. 791; ... Sturm v. Sawyer, 2 Pa. Super. Ct. 254; Lentz v ... Lentz, 2 Phila. 148. In the case of Taylor v ... Smith, 21 S.E. 202, the Supreme Court of North Carolina ... held that the act abolishing survivorship in estates in joint ... tenancy did ... ...
-
Buffaloe v. Barnes
...agreements as to personalty such as to make the future rights of the parties depend upon the fact of survivorship, citing Taylor v. Smith, 116 N.C. 531, 21 S.E. 202. It said that the position of the wife was stronger because Waldroup had required the issue of new certificates of stock to hi......
-
Jones v. Waldroup
...This has nothing to do with a joint tenancy in personalty with survivorship created by contract, either bilateral agreement or gift. Taylor v. Smith, supra. construe the conveyance, admittedly made by Dr. Waldroup, with reference to the Blue Ridge stock, as creating a common ownership in th......
-
Equitable Loan & Sec. Co v. Waring
...Jones v. Cable, 114 Pa. 586, 7 Atl. 791; Sturm v. Sawyer, 2 Pa. Super. Ct. 254; Lentz v. Lentz, 2 Phila. 148. In the case of Taylor v. Smith, 21 S. E. 202, the Supreme Court of North Carolina held that the act abolishing survivorship in estates in joint tenancy did not prohibit contracts ma......