Taylor v. State, 52639
| Citation | 398 So.2d 1341 |
| Decision Date | 03 June 1981 |
| Docket Number | No. 52639,52639 |
| Parties | Arnold Edward TAYLOR v. STATE of Mississippi. |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
James J. Fougerousse, Jackson, for appellant.
Bill Allain, Atty. Gen. by Mark A. Chinn, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.
Before PATTERSON, C. J., and LEE and HAWKINS, JJ.
LEE, Justice, for the Court:
Arnold Edward Taylor was indicted, tried and convicted in the Circuit Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County, Honorable William F. Coleman, presiding, for forgery and was sentenced to five (5) years with the Mississippi Department of Corrections, two (2) years of which were suspended. Taylor has appealed to this Court and assigns three (3) errors in the trial below.
Prior to January 19, 1979, approximately one hundred (100) consumer money orders mailed from a money order company to Star Supermarkets in Jackson, Mississippi, disappeared from the United States mails. On January 19, 1979, a person who identified himself as Jessie L. Stevenson appeared at a drive-in teller's window of the Medical Center Branch of Deposit Guaranty National Bank and presented one of the money orders for payment. When asked for identification, he displayed a driver's license which identified him as Jessie L. Stevenson, payee in the money order. The teller, Mary Ashley, cashed the money order and made a note of the tag on the car driven by the individual to be Texas # FJV 643. Later that day, the same incident occurred at the Meadowbrook Branch of First National Bank in Jackson where a person presented a similar money order for payment and identified himself as Jessie L. Stevenson. The teller, Rosie Bell Cobb, recorded the driver's license number and paid the order.
A search warrant was obtained and, upon search of appellant's premises, the Texas license plate # FJV 643 was found. On March 29, 1979, appellant was arrested and charged with forgery in connection with the above incidents. Separate indictments were returned and appellant was convicted on the first charge (Deposit Guaranty) and was sentenced to ten (10) years. His appeal is pending in that case. The present case involves the First National Bank incident.
The evidence at trial indicated that appellant worked for the Post Office Dispatch Annex which serviced the supermarkets ordering the money orders and also the mailing address of Jessie L. Stevenson. Mr. Stevenson testified that the driver's license was his, that he had ordered it through the mails, that it had never been received by him, and that he had never seen the money order which bore his name. A handwriting expert testified that, although he could not positively say the money order bore the signature of appellant, from compared handwriting specimens, he was of the opinion that it was "highly probable" appellant forged the money order.
I.
Did the lower court commit error in permitting introduction of testimony about the Deposit Guaranty Bank forgery?
On the trial of the present case, Rosie Bell Cobb, teller at First National Bank, Meadowbrook Branch, testified concerning the cashing of the forged instrument, but was unable to identify appellant as the person who presented the money order. Thereupon, over objection of appellant, Mary Ashley, teller at the Deposit Guaranty Bank, Medical Center Branch, testified concerning the cashing of the money order there and positively identified appellant. He now assigns as error the introduction of that testimony since it contained evidence of a separate and distinct crime.
In Gray v. State, 351 So.2d 1342 (Miss.1977), this Court said:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Donald v. State, 55586
...State, 445 So.2d 1373 (Miss.1984); Davis v. State, 431 So.2d 468 (Miss.1983); Johnson v. State, 416 So.2d 383 (Miss.1982); Taylor v. State, 398 So.2d 1341 (Miss.1981). In these cases cited by appellee, evidence of other crimes was an integral part of the prosecution's identification of defe......
-
Bayse v. State, 53748
...a verdict of guilty, the motion for a directed verdict must be overruled. Wilks v. State, 408 So.2d 68 (Miss.1981); Taylor v. State, 398 So.2d 1341 (Miss.1981). In the instant case, for purposes of analyzing the appellant's request for a directed verdict, the witnesses' testimony that the b......
-
Ford v. State
...security camera in West Memphis, Arkansas. Appellant is one of the two men in each set. The modus operandi is identical. Taylor v. State, 398 So.2d 1341 (Miss.1981). In Taylor, supra, there was a forged instrument presented to a bank teller. The teller testified as to circumstances of the c......
-
McClinton v. State, 54449
...verdict must be overruled and the peremptory instruction must be denied. Wilks v. State, 408 So.2d 68 (Miss.1981); Taylor v. State, 398 So.2d 1341 (Miss.1981); Goldman v. State, 406 So.2d 816 (Miss.1981); Warn v. State, 349 So.2d 1055 Although the evidence was largely circumstantial, we are......