Taylor v. State, 65-541
| Decision Date | 15 March 1966 |
| Docket Number | No. 65-541,65-541 |
| Citation | 183 So.2d 865 |
| Parties | Otice Moore TAYLOR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender and Phillip A. Hubbart, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before TILLMAN PEARSON, CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.
This is an appeal from the lower court's summary denial of the defendant's second petition for relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. One, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, which attacks the voluntary nature of his plea of guilty at the time of trial.
An examination of the petition, record, and briefs indicates that no new grounds for relief are set forth that were not considered by this court in its denial of the first petition under Rule One. See Taylor v. State, Fla.App.1964, 169 So.2d 861.
This case is therefore affirmed on the authority of Washington v. Mayo, Fla.1955, 77 So.2d 620; Simpson v. State, Fla.App.1964, 165 So .2d 195.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lawson v. State
...in prior motions. Echols v. State, 210 So.2d 13 (Fla.App.2d 1968); Weeks v. State, 201 So.2d 764 (Fla.App.3d 1967); Taylor v. State, 183 So.2d 865 (Fla.App.3d 1966). However, in the case Sub judice, the previous denials were authorized under the reasoning in Fretwell v. Wainwright, Supra, a......
-
Blunt v. State, I-66
...for post-conviction relief. As to the grounds asserted in the earlier motion however, the denial thereof was res judicata. Taylor v. State, Fla.App., 183 So.2d 865. We now look to the new matters alleged in the second motion to determine whether they are matters which support a collateral a......
- Licata v. Acolite Sign Co.