Taylor v. Triangle Porsche-Audi, Inc., PORSCHE-AUD
| Decision Date | 06 April 1976 |
| Docket Number | INC,PORSCHE-AUD |
| Citation | 289 N.C. 619,223 S.E.2d 396 |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | Robert Earl TAYLOR v. TRIANGLE |
Winston, Coleman & Bernholz, for plaintiff.
Newsom, Graham, Strayhorn, Hedrick, Murray & Bryson, for defendant.
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 27 N.C.App. 711, 220 S.E.2d 806. Denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
26 cases
-
Richardson v. Bank of America
...Defendants also cite Taylor v. Triangle Porsche-Audi, Inc., 27 N.C.App. 711, 220 S.E.2d 806 (1975), disc. review denied, 289 N.C. 619, 223 S.E.2d 396 (1976). However, Taylor is inapposite because the plaintiff in that case sought to rescind the contract and recover the sales price rather th......
-
Stachlowski v. Stach
...by the court. See Taylor v. Triangle Porsche-Audi, Inc., 27 N.C.App. 711, 716, 220 S.E.2d 806, 810-11 (1975), rev. denied, 289 N.C. 619, 223 S.E.2d 396 (1976). 2 Therefore, we cannot conclude that entry of judgment occurred under paragraph two of Rule 58 when the court rendered judgment on ......
-
First Atlantic v. Dunlea Realty, COA97-540.
...is final.... Taylor v. Triangle Porsche-Audi, Inc., 27 N.C.App. 711, 717, 220 S.E.2d 806, 811 (1975), disc. review denied, 289 N.C. 619, 223 S.E.2d 396 (1976) (citations In a fraud case, damage is the amount of loss caused by the difference between what was received and what was promised th......
-
Mabrey v. Smith
...justifying reasoning is shown." Taylor v. Triangle Porsche-Audi, Inc., 27 N.C.App. 711, 220 S.E.2d 806 (1975),review denied, 289 N.C. 619, 223 S.E.2d 396 (1976). Defendants in the instant case sought to amend their pleadings to include an immunity defense more than one year after the compla......
Request a trial to view additional results