Taylor v. Welch
Decision Date | 03 February 1913 |
Citation | 153 S.W. 490,168 Mo.App. 223 |
Parties | JOHN W. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. JAMES WELCH, VIRGINIA A. WELCH, and L. W. SCOTT, Trustee, Respondents |
Court | Kansas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Saline Circuit Court.--Hon. Samuel Davis, Judge.
REVERSED AND REMANDED (with directions).
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
T. H Harvey for appellant.
L. W Scott for respondents.
--This is an action in equity begun in the circuit court of Saline county, December 9, 1910, to obtain a decree declaring a trust in favor of plaintiff and ordering the defendant Scott as trustee, to pay plaintiff the sum due him as such beneficiary.
The answer, which is voluminous, denies the existence of a trust in favor of plaintiff and interposes the additional defense of res adjudicata. Defendants prevailed in the circuit court and the cause is before us on the appeal of plaintiff.
The defendants, James Welch and Virginia A. Welch, husband and wife, live in Saline county where the husband owned a valuable farm. He became an invalid, unable to attend to business and placed his affairs in the hands of an agent to whom it appears he gave very wide and comprehensive authority. The agent first appointed resigned in 1906 and defendant Scott was appointed in his stead. The authority with which Welch invested Scott included the power to lease the farm, to collect rent, pay taxes and interest on certain notes the Welches had executed and to divide the remainder of the income equally between Welch and his wife. This arrangement continued until March 14, 1910, when defendant Welch sold the farm for $ 19,923.75. A warranty deed was executed and delivered to the purchaser and Scott received the payment of the purchase money. Mrs. Welch joined in the execution of the deed for the purpose of conveying her inchoate right of dower. On March 14, 1910, and immediately after the consummation of the sale and the payment of the purchase money to Scott, the defendants executed the following instrument in writing:
"This instrument of writing, made and entered into by and between James Welch and Virginia Welch, his wife, of the county of Saline, State of Missouri, parties of the first part, and L. W. Scott, of said county and State, party of the second part,
Witnesseth, That whereas the said parties of the first part have sold their farm in Saline county, and now have on hand a large sum of money, the proceeds of said sale, and whereas there are several debts which the parties of the first part now owe, and whereas it is the wish and desire of the parties of the first part to pay off and discharge all debts now due and outstanding, and to make provision for the support and maintenance of their family for the ensuing year, and whereas it is the wish and desire of the parties of the first part to make a lifetime provision for the support and maintenance of themselves and their family for and during the period of their natural life and the lifetime of the survivor of them and whereas, the said James Welch, by reason of a stroke of paralysis by which he was afflicted some years ago, has become so feeble and infirm of body as to render him unable to attend to business and, having now reached such an advanced age in life that he can never hope to resume business again even though he should recover entirely from his partial paralysis from which he has so long suffered, and whereas the parties of the first part desire to place this money in the hands of a safe and discreet business man to take care of, to manage, loan out, and collect all interest which shall accrue therefrom, out of the principal remaining after certain expenditures hereinafter set forth are made, and believing that the said L. W. Scott, party of the second part is such a person, qualified to discharge the trust herein and hereby created, therefore, he said James Welch and Virginia Welch, his wife, parties of the first part, do by these presents, assign, transfer and set over unto the said L. W. Scott, party of the second part, all the money derived from the sale of the farm aforesaid, heretofore mentioned, to have and to hold to him and his successors in trust, however for the following purposes:
"And the said party of the second part...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Odom v. Langston, 40207.
...then there would be no former adjudication, to-wit: Stephens v. Moore, 249 S.W. 601; O'Malley v. Musick, 177 S.W. 749; Taylor v. Welch, 168 Mo. App. 223, 153 S.W. l.c. 494; M., K. & T. Ry. Co. v. American Surety Co., 236 S.W. 657. (2) The judge who wrote the decision in the will case wrongf......
-
Odom v. Langston
...then there would be no former adjudication, to-wit: Stephens v. Moore, 249 S.W. 601; O'Malley v. Musick, 177 S.W. 749; Taylor v. Welch, 168 Mo.App. 223, 153 S.W. l.c. M., K. & T. Ry. Co. v. American Surety Co., 236 S.W. 657. (2) The judge who wrote the decision in the will case wrongfully h......
-
Odom v. Langston
...of causes of action and the thing sued for. Stephens v. Moore, 249 S.W. 601; O'Malley v. Musick, 177 S.W. 749, 191 Mo.App. 405; Taylor v. Welch, 168 Mo.App. 223; Gwin Smur, 49 Mo.App. 361; State to Use v. Hollingshead, 83 Mo.App. 678; Winham v. Kline, 77 Mo.App. 36. (26) The trustees were m......
-
Melvin v. Hoffman
...(2) The trust is an executed, and not an executory, one. Ewing v. Shannahan, 113 Mo. 195; Watson v. Payne, 143 Mo.App. 728; Taylor v. Welch, 168 Mo.App. 230; Banking Co. v. Miller, 190 Mo. 668. (3) instrument is not testamentary in character, but passed the title upon its execution and deli......