Taylor v. Wilson
Decision Date | 25 April 1906 |
Citation | 93 S.W. 109 |
Parties | TAYLOR v. WILSON. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
R. D. Wright, for appellant. Stevens & Pickett, for appellee.
Certified question from the Court of Civil Appeals of the First District, as follows:
The statute to be construed provides: "No person who is an inhabitant of this state shall be sued out of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial28 cases
-
IN RE PERRY
...145 S.W.3d at 342, citing Pittsburg Water Heater Co. of Texas v. Sullivan, 115 Tex. 417, 282 S.W. 576, 578 (1926); Taylor v. Wilson, 99 Tex. 651, 93 S.W. 109, 109 (1906); Pearson v. West, 97 Tex. 238, 77 S.W. 944, 945 (1904); see also Nat'l Truckers Serv., Inc., 480 S.W.2d at 457, quoting F......
-
Johnson v. State
...its strict meaning, and given it the meaning of "residence" in such statutes. Pearson v. West, 97 Tex. 238, 77 S. W. 944; Taylor v. Wilson, 99 Tex. 651, 93 S. W. 109; Latham v. Continental Supply Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 230 S. W. 230; Wrenn v. Brooks (Tex. Civ. App.) 257 S. W. 299; Littlefield......
-
Ladner v. Reliance Corp.
...of the state in the county in which the plaintiff resides, and concerning this the Supreme Court said in Taylor v. Wilson, 99 Tex. 651, at page 654, 93 S.W. 109, at page 111: 'The third provision covers a case, which, but for it, would not have been provided for, where the defendant is not ......
-
Oakland Motor Car Co. v. Jones
...do business in Texas, is necessarily one who resides without the state within the purview of said provision of the statute. In Taylor v. Wilson, 93 S. W. 109, 110, the Supreme Court regarded it as already settled that "`domicile' and `inhabitant' used in the first clause" of said article 19......
Request a trial to view additional results