Tcholakian v. Tcholakian

• Decision Date: 05 March 1968
• Parties: Sheila TCHOLAKIAN, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Haroutiun A. TCHOLAKIAN, Respondent-Appellant.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Page 920

287 N.Y.S.2d 920

29 A.D.2d 848

Sheila TCHOLAKIAN, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Haroutiun A. TCHOLAKIAN, Respondent-Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 5, 1968.

James J. Leibman, New York City, for petitioner-respondent.

Joseph A. D'Addario, New York City, for appellant.

Before BOTEIN, P.J., and STEUER, CAPOZZOLI, McGIVERN and McNALLY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Orders of Family Court, respectively entered April 28, 1967, July 24, 1967, September 13, 1967 and September 20, 1967, unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to petitioner-respondent. The incidental determination by the Family Court that the Mexican divorce decree is invalid is not res judicata in the action pending between the parties in the Supreme Court (Loomis v. Loomis, 288 N.Y. 222, 42 N.E.2d 495, 147 A.L.R. 183), and the instant disposition is without prejudice to the maintenance of that action.