Technical Publishing Co. v. Technology Publishing Corp.

Decision Date24 March 1972
Docket NumberNo. 71 C 1879.,71 C 1879.
Citation339 F. Supp. 225
PartiesTECHNICAL PUBLISHING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. TECHNOLOGY PUBLISHING CORPORATION, Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois

Winston, Strawn, Smith & Patterson, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Michael Levin, Cohen & Levin, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

McLAREN, District Judge.

This case comes before the Court on defendant's motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction over the person. Plaintiff, Technical Publishing Company, has brought this diversity action for unfair competition against defendant, Technology Publishing Corporation. Both parties publish engineering trade magazines, catalogues, and directories on a national basis. Plaintiff's principal place of business is in Illinois; defendant's is in California. Plaintiff claims defendant is committing a tortious act against it by its subsequent adoption for its business and publications of an infringing trade name and designation substantially similar to plaintiff's trade name and designation. Defendant was served in California under the Illinois "long-arm" statute. Ill.Rev.Stat., ch. 110, § 17. Defendant has made a special and limited appearance for the purpose of contesting this Court's jurisdiction over its person.

The Court finds that the jurisdiction acquired over the defendant is not inconsistent with due process and therefore denies the motion to dismiss.

Section 17(1) (a) of the Illinois "long-arm" statute provides that any person who transacts business in Illinois submits to the jurisdiction of its courts as to any cause of action which arises from "transacting business" in Illinois. Section 17(1) (b) has the same effect where the cause of action arises from the commission of a tortious act in Illinois.

The "transacting business" language of Section 17(1) (a) has been interpreted to expand the jurisdiction of Illinois courts as broadly as due process permits. Nelson v. Miller, 11 Ill.2d 378, 389, 143 N.E.2d 673, 679 (1957). "Due process requires only that in order to subject a defendant to a judgment in personam, if he be not present within the territory of the forum, he have certain minimum contacts with it such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend `traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.'" International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316, 66 S.Ct. 154, 158, 90 L.Ed. 95 (1945).

Whether these "sufficient minimum contacts" exist must be ascertained by what is fair and reasonable in the circumstances of the particular situation.

"In applying this flexible test, the relevant inquiry is whether a nonresident has engaged in some act or conduct by which he may be said to have invoked the benefits and protection of the laws of the forum." Hutter Northern Trust v. Door County Chamber of Commerce, 403 F.2d 481, 484 (7th Cir. 1968).

Defendant in its affidavits avers that it is a California corporation with its principal place of business in California, and that it is not licensed to do business in Illinois nor does it maintain any offices or agents in Illinois. However, discovery in this case has brought out the following facts:

1) Defendant's publications have a nationwide circulation.
2) Most of defendant's magazines are provided to subscribers free of charge on a "controlled circulation" basis, i. e., the magazines are sent to qualified recipients, generally designated by occupational characteristics, with costs usually paid by advertisers.
3) For those issues actually sold to readers, defendant estimates it receives $2,840 annually from Illinois subscribers. This constitutes approximately 2% of the total national annual sales to paid subscribers in fiscal 1971.
4) Defendant's publications had a total of 142 paid subscribers in Illinois in 1971.
5) Defendant
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • UNITED STATES DENT. INST. v. American Ass'n of Orth.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • 6 Junio 1975
    ...which the claim is based took place in Illinois and that the complaint states a cause of action. Technical Publishing Co. v. Technology Publishing Corp., 339 F.Supp. 225, 227 (N.D.Ill.1972). Plaintiffs allege that defendants sought to unlawfully restrain USDI's trade in Illinois, and elsewh......
  • In re Oil Spill by" Amoco Cadiz" off Coast of France
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • 26 Diciembre 1979
    ...based on the tort of common law fraud, yet the jurisdictional act was the transaction of business); Technical Publishing Co. v. Technology Publishing Corp., 339 F.Supp. 225 (N.D.Ill.1972) (where the case was based on the tort of unfair competition but the court's analysis focused primarily ......
  • Ventura County, State of Cal. v. Neice
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Indiana
    • 3 Mayo 1982
    ...55 F.R.D. 156, decided 13 April, 1972); or continued use of a confusingly similar trade name (Technical Publishing Co. v. Technology Publishing Corp. (1972), 339 F.Supp. 225), to cite but a few Neill, supra, 153 Ind.App. at 153, 286 N.E.2d 427. This analysis is equally applicable to the law......
  • Ashe v. Pepsico, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 27 Julio 1977
    ...parties who either produced or distributed products alleged to cause an infringement in Illinois. Technical Publishing Co. v. Technology Publishing Corp., 339 F.Supp. 225 (N.E.Ill.1972); Waltham Watch Co. v. Hallmark Jewelers, Inc., 336 F.Supp. 1010 (N.D.Ill.1971); Swift & Co. v. Farmers Pr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT