Teehan v. State, 84-842

• Decision Date: 06 May 1986
• Docket Number: No. 84-842,84-842
• Citation: 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1057,488 So.2d 132
• Parties: 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1057 Lawrence TEEHAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
• Court: Florida District Court of Appeals

Page 132

488 So.2d 132

11 Fla. L. Weekly 1057

Lawrence TEEHAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 84-842.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 6, 1986.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Mark J. Berkowitz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted of battery on a law enforcement officer. The trial judge increased the points under the guidelines and aggravated the sentence of the appellant to five years and thereby departed from the guidelines. His reasons for departure were punishment and deterrence.

We reverse and remand for resentencing. It was error to score additional points for victim injury when there was no evidence of same and it was not an essential element of the crime. Holloman v. State, 482 So.2d 431 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Inscore v. State, 480 So.2d 218, 219 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Whitfield v. State, 471 So.2d 633 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). It was also error to aggravate the sentence for the reasons pronounced. Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985); Cawthon v. State, 486 So.2d 90 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Patty v. State, 486 So.2d 16 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Battles v. State, 482 So.2d 540 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

Therefore the sentence under review is reversed and the matter is returned to the trial court for resentencing.

Reversed and remanded with directions.