Teitelbaum v. Maimonides Med. Ctr.
| Decision Date | 23 November 2016 |
| Citation | 144 A.D.3d 1013,43 N.Y.S.3d 66,2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 07944 |
| Parties | Hindy TEITELBAUM, etc., et al., respondents, v. MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER, et al., appellants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
144 A.D.3d 1013
43 N.Y.S.3d 66
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 07944
Hindy TEITELBAUM, etc., et al., respondents,
v.
MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER, et al., appellants.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov. 23, 2016.
Aaronson Rappaport Feinstein & Deutsch, LLP, New York, NY (Steven C. Mandell of counsel), for appellants Maimonides Medical Center, Arie Schwartz, Pedram Bral, Yellagondahal V. Janardhan, and Suman Agrawal.
Vincent D. McNamara, East Norwich, NY (Helen M. Benzie of counsel), for appellant Getl L. Kaspar.
Torgan, Cooper & Aaron, P.C. (Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & De Cicco, LLP, New York, NY [Brian J. Isaac and Jillian Rosen ], of counsel), for respondents.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P., JEFFREY A. COHEN, ROBERT J. MILLER and HECTOR D. LaSALLE, JJ.
In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendants Maimonides Medical Center, Arie Schwartz, Pedram Bral, Yellagondahal V. Janardhan, and Suman Agrawal appeal, and the defendant Getl L. Kaspar separately appeals, as limited by their respective briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated January 16, 2015, as, in effect, denied their respective motions pursuant to CPLR 3126 to dismiss the
complaint insofar as asserted against each of them unless the infant plaintiff failed to submit to two independent medical examinations on specified dates.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable by the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
"The determination whether to strike a pleading for failure to comply with court-ordered disclosure lies within the sound discretion of the trial court" (Fishbane v. Chelsea Hall, LLC, 65 A.D.3d 1079, 1081, 885 N.Y.S.2d 718 ; see Apladenaki v. Greenpoint Mtge. Funding, Inc., 117 A.D.3d 976, 986 N.Y.S.2d 589 ; Arpino v. F.J.F. &...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Kuang v. Metlife
...Farber, LLP, 83 A.D.3d 685, 686–687, 920 N.Y.S.2d 394 [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Teitelbaum v. Maimonides Med. Ctr., 144 A.D.3d 1013, 1014, 43 N.Y.S.3d 66 ; Orgel v. Stewart Tit. Ins. Co., 91 A.D.3d 922, 923, 938 N.Y.S.2d 131 ). Here, the remedy of precluding the ......
-
Gately v. Drummond, 2016–00258
...the defendant's failure to appear at the hearing and for any delay in moving to vacate his default (see Scholem v. Acadia Realty L.P., 144 A.D.3d at 1013, 42 N.Y.S.3d 214 ; 77 N.Y.S.3d 522 Swensen v. MV Transp., Inc., 89 A.D.3d 924, 925, 933 N.Y.S.2d 96 ). In addition, there was no showing ......
-
Norman v. 659 Rest. Inc.
...LLP, 83 A.D.3d 685, 686-687 [2d Dept 2011]; [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; Teitelbaum v. Maimonides Med. Ctr., 144 A.D.3d 1013 [2d Dept 2016]; Orgel v. Stewart Tit. Ins. Co., 91 A.D.3d 922 [2d Dept 2012].) Additionally, pursuant to the Uniform Rules for Trial Courts, "[w]......
- Fortino v. Wheels, Inc.
-
Physical and mental examinations
...statutes and information pertaining to the enforcement of this discovery device and others. Teitelbaum v. Maimonides Medical Center , 144 A.D.3d 1013, 43 N.Y.S.3d 66 (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, 2016). In a medical malpractice action, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in d......