Tell v. Broward County
Citation | 733 So.2d 1131 |
Decision Date | 09 June 1999 |
Docket Number | No. 98-1213.,98-1213. |
Parties | Meah Rothman TELL, Appellant, v. BROWARD COUNTY, Appellee. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
Meah Rothman Tell of Meah Rothman Tell, P.A., Coral Springs, pro se.
Sharon L. Cruz, Interim County Attorney, Anthony C. Musto, Chief Appellate Counsel, and Tamara M. Scrudders, Assistant County Attorney, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
On this appeal from a declaratory judgment the issue is whether the Broward County ordinance establishing a civil service system may validly provide for classifications to be excluded by subsequent resolution. We affirm the circuit court judgment upholding the validity of that provision.
Broward County is a charter county and, as such, its powers are derived from Article VIII, Sec. 1(g) of the Florida Constitution. See State v. Broward County, 468 So.2d 965 (Fla.1985)
. Relevant here is its charter provision that "[A]ll powers of the County shall be carried into execution as provided by this Charter or, if the Charter makes no provision, as provided by ordinance, resolution of the County Commission, or by the Constitution and Laws of Florida." Broward County's charter authorizes it to establish a civil service system, but does not require that it be established by ordinance rather than resolution.
Meah Rothman Tell ("Tell") was hired on June 12, 1995, as Attorney II in the Support Enforcement Division, a position not then exempt from classified service. An employee in classified service must successfully complete a six month probationary period before benefits become vested, after which the employee may not be terminated without cause, notice and opportunity for a hearing.
On July 11, 1995, the Broward County Commission enacted Resolution No. 95-659 which excluded the Attorney II position from civil service and designated it as an exempt position. The resolution became effective September 1, 1995, prior to completion of Tell's probationary period. On July 24, 1996, Tell's employment was summarily terminated without cause, notice or opportunity for hearing. Tell filed this suit for declaratory judgment seeking a determination that her position remained on the protected list because the county did not have authority to change the provisions of the civil service ordinance by resolution. Ruling against Tell on that issue, the trial court held that the position of Attorney II had been excluded from the civil service system effective September 1, 1995, and that Tell's probationary period not having been completed by that time, she remained an...
To continue reading
Request your trial