Temple v. Ferguson
Decision Date | 24 January 1903 |
Citation | 72 S.W. 455 |
Parties | TEMPLE et al. v. FERGUSON et al. |
Court | Tennessee Supreme Court |
Appeal from chancery court, Davidson county; H. H. Cook, Chancellor.
Suit by C. L. Temple and others against W. H. Ferguson and others. From a decree of the court of chancery appeals affirming a decree dismissing the appeal, complainants appeal. Affirmed.
Jas. L. Watts, for appellants. Smith & Maddin, for appellees.
The controversy in this case is over a tract of land comprising 12 acres, situated in the Nineteenth civil district of Davidson county. It is claimed by complainants as heirs at law of Mrs. Anne Tennessee Temple, and by defendant as devisee under the will of Mrs. Temple. The settlement of the controversy depends upon the proper construction of a certain deed of settlement. It appears from the record that on the 26th of October, 1861, J. E. Gleaves, clerk and master of the chancery court of Davidson county, conveyed to John Taylor, trustee for Mrs. Anne Tennessee Temple, wife of C. L. Temple, the tract of land in question. The conveyance was made upon the direction of C. L. Temple, the husband. It conveyed John Taylor, the trustee, died many years ago, and no successor to him was appointed. C. L. Temple, the husband, also died, leaving his wife, the said Mrs. Anne T., surviving him. Mrs. Temple died in 1902, leaving a last will and testament, in which she devised the land in question to her granddaughter, Mrs. Bettie L. Ferguson. The present bill was filed by the four sons of C. L. and Anne Tennessee Temple, claiming the land by inheritance, and seeking to remove the devise made to Bettie L. Ferguson as a cloud on their title. The theory of the bill is that Mrs. Anne T. Temple was not vested with such title as she could convey by will or otherwise. Complainants allege that upon the death of John Taylor, trustee, the legal title to the land descended to his heirs, and the bill prays that the title be devested out of them, and that the land be sold for partition among the complainants as heirs of Mrs. Temple. A demurrer was interposed on behalf of defendant Bettie L. Ferguson, which was sustained by the chancellor, and the bill dismissed. The court of chancery appeals affirmed the decree of the chancellor.
The first question for determination is whether the conveyance to John Taylor, trustee, created an active or a mere naked, dry trust. The law is now well settled in this state that when the trust is created, and the property conveyed to a trustee to hold for the separate use and benefit of a married woman, an active trust is thereby created. As stated by Justice Lurton in Jourolmon v. Massengill, 86 Tenn. 81, 5 S. W. 719:
The next question that arises is, what effect did the death of C. L. Temple, the husband, have upon the trust estate? The record discloses that the husband,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Harris v. France
...be converted into legal estates by the falling in of the trust. Ellis v. Fisher, 35 Tenn. 231, 65 Am.Dec. 52; Temple v. Ferguson, 110 Tenn. 84, 72 S.W. 455, 100 Am.St.Rep. 791. The question is whether it is possible for any estate created by the devise to vest in interest at a time beyond t......
-
Boyd v. Ducktown Chemical & Iron Co.
...36, is not in point, for the deed involved contained an express provision for forfeiture and reversion. Nor is Temple v. Ferguson, 110 Tenn. 84, 72 S.W. 455, 100 Am.St.Rep. 791, an analogous case, for it merely holds that a conveyance to a trustee for the separate use of a married woman ves......
-
Keck v. McKinstry
...of the trust, is extinguished, and the whole estate, legal and equitable, vested in the beneficiaries. Temple v. Ferguson, 110 Tenn. 84, 72 S. W. 455, 100 Am. St. Rep. 791;Ellis v. Fisher, 3 Sneed, 231, 65 Am. Dec. 52; 3 Pom. Eq. (4th Ed.) § 989; 39 Cyc. 207 et seq. Albert received the deed......
-
Patton v. Hardison
...of the trust require.' Walt v. Walt, 113 Tenn. 189, 81 S.W. 228; Dunham v. Harvey, 111 Tenn. 620, 69 S.W. 772; Temple v. Ferguson, 110 Tenn. 84 72 S.W. 455, 100 Am.St.Rep. 791; Hensor v. Wright, 88 Tenn. 501, 12 S.W. 1035 Jourolmon v. Massengill, 86 Tenn. 81, 5 S.W. 719; Davis v. Williams, ......