Templeton v. Wolf

Decision Date31 October 1853
Citation19 Mo. 101
PartiesTEMPLETON & MCKEE, Appellants, v. WOLF, Respondent.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

1. It is error to refuse to permit a plaintiff to take a non-suit.

Appeal from St. Louis Law Commissioner's Court.

J. W. Skinner, for appellants.

GAMBLE, Judge.

In this case, the court having given certain instructions to the jury, after the evidence was closed, the plaintiffs asked that they might be allowed to take a non-suit, but the court refused to permit it, and a verdict and judgment were given for the defendant.

The statutes of this State have always recognized the right of a plaintiff to take a non-suit, and have limited its exercise to the time previous to the retiring of the jury to consider their verdict. This practice is not affected by the code, being entirely consistent with it.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded, the other judges concurring.

To continue reading

Request your trial
24 cases
  • Stith v. Newberry Co., 31563.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 8, 1935
    ...cannot deny at least without good cause. [Mayer v. Old, 51 Mo. App. 214; Derrington v. Poplar Bluff (Mo. App.), 186 S.W. 561; Templeton v. Wolf, 19 Mo. 101.] The taking of a nonsuit is essentially the act of the plaintiff rather than of the court, which records and gives sanction to the pla......
  • Stith v. J.J. Newberry Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 8, 1935
    ... ... [ Mayer v ... Old, 51 Mo.App. 214; Derrington v. Poplar Bluff (Mo ... App.), 186 S.W. 561; Templeton v. Wolf, 19 Mo ... 101.] The taking of a nonsuit is essentially the act of the ... plaintiff rather than of the court, which records and gives ... ...
  • Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. v. Manning
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • March 14, 1910
    ... ... before the jury has actually retired. Wood v ... Nortman, 85 Mo. 298, 304; Templeton v. Wolf, ... 19 Mo. 101; Lawrence v. Shreve, 26 Mo. 492; ... Mayer v. Old, 51 Mo.App. 214, 218; Bank v ... Gray, 146 Mo. 568, 570, 48 S.W. 447; ... ...
  • Barnard v. Keathley
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 19, 1910
    ...convincing. Kaiser v. Gammon, 95 Mo. 217. Fraud is not to be presumed because the purchaser afterward sold to the administrator. Templeton v. Wolf, 19 Mo. 101. The validity of the sale does not depend upon the of the purchase money. Hodges v. Black, 8 Mo.App. 389. (5) The court erred becaus......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT