TEP, AND KJC v. Leavitt, 93-C-653A.
| Decision Date | 17 September 1993 |
| Docket Number | No. 93-C-653A.,93-C-653A. |
| Citation | 840 F. Supp. 110 |
| Parties | T.E.P., and K.J.C., individually and on behalf of class of persons who were HIV positive or had AIDS at the time of their current marriages and/or became HIV positive or developed AIDS after they married their current spouses, Plaintiffs, v. Michael LEAVITT, Governor; and Janet C. Graham, Attorney General, Defendants. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — District of Utah |
Brian M. Barnard, John Pace, Utah Legal Clinic, Salt Lake City, for plaintiffs.
J. Mark Ward, Asst. Utah Atty. Gen., Carol Clawson, Sol. Gen., Salt Lake City, UT for defendants.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Defendants have moved this court for an order of summary judgment declaring Utah Code Ann. § 30-1-2(1) (1993 Supp.) void and invalid and enjoining further enforcement of the statute. Plaintiffs, representing two classes certified by the court by separate order, do not oppose the motion.
Having considered the motion, with accompanying memorandum of law, the court is persuaded that Utah Code Ann. § 30-1-2(1), which prohibits and declares void marriage by persons with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), is violative of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (ADA) (1993 Supp.), and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (1993 Supp.) In that regard, the ADA provides that a public entity may not discriminate against a qualified individual with a disability. 42 U.S.C. § 12132. Disability has been defined as a "physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of the major life activities." 28 C.F.R. § 35.104 (). AIDS is such a physical impairment. See 28 C.F.R. § 35.104(1)(B)(ii).
Under Article VI of the United States Constitution, federal law takes precedence over conflicting state law. Accordingly, Utah Code Ann. § 30-1-2(1), as it applies to AIDS, cannot stand. Further, because the offending statute runs afoul of federal statutory law, there is no need to determine whether the statute is unconstitutional under either the Utah State Constitution or the United States Constitution.
Based on the foregoing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted. Utah Code Ann. § 30-1-2(1), as it relates to AIDS, is void and invalid. Defendants' are permanently enjoined from enforcing said statute against named plaintif...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hoepfl v. Barlow
...Inc., 855 F.Supp. 371, 374 n. 5 (N.D.Ga. 1994); United States v. Morvant, 843 F.Supp. 1092, 1093-94 (E.D.La.1994); T.E.P. v. Leavitt, 840 F.Supp. 110, 111 (D.Utah 1993); see also 28 C.F.R. § 8 E.g., Holland America Ins. Co. v. Succession of Roy, 777 F.2d 992, 997 (5th Cir.1985); Roland Mach......
-
Abbott v. Bragdon
...v. Hull, 873 F.Supp. 72, 78 (N.D.Ohio 1994); Doe v. Kohn Nast & Graf, P.C., 862 F.Supp. 1310, 1318-20 (E.D.Pa.1994); T.E.P. v. Leavitt, 840 F.Supp. 110, 111 (D.Utah 1993); Doe v. District of Columbia, 796 F.Supp. 559, 568 (D.D.C. 1992); Glanz v. Vernick, 756 F.Supp. 632, 635 Less clear is w......
-
Oak Ridge Care Center v. Racine County, Wis.
...received a benefit. Just as granting marriage licenses is an activity of a public entity, so are zoning decisions. See, T.E.P. v. Leavitt, 840 F.Supp. 110 (D.Utah 1993) (ADA invalidated statute that forbade people with AIDS from marrying). Even if zoning decisions are not an activity, a ser......
-
Gonzales v. Garner Food Services, Inc.
...28 C.R.R. §§ 35.104(1)(B)(ii) & 36.104(1)(B)(ii); United States v. Morvant, 843 F.Supp. 1092, 1093-94 (E.D.La.1994); T.E.P. v. Leavitt, 840 F.Supp. 110, 111 (D.Utah 1993). 6 This language is not found in other discrimination statutes but was specifically adopted in this bill to "ensure that......
-
Stretching the Limits of the Ada: Asymptomatic Hiv-positive Status as a Disability in Bragdon v. Abbott, 118 S. Ct. 2196 (1998)
...873 F. Supp. 72, 78 (N.D. Ohio 1994); Doe v. Kohn Nast and Graf, P.C., 862 F. Supp. 1310, 1318-20 (E.D. Pa. 1994); T.E.P. v. Leavitt, 840 F. Supp. 110, 111 (D. Utah 1993); Doe v. District of Columbia, 796 F. Supp. 559, 568 (D.D.C. 1992); Glanz v. Vernick, 756 F. Supp. 632, 635 (D. Mass. 199......
-
Is HIV a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act: unanswered questions after Bragdon v. Abbott.
...(E.D.Va. 1995) ("It is now settled law that HIV-positive individuals are "disabled" within the meaning of the ADA."); T.E.P. v. Leavitt, 840 F. Supp. 110, 111 (D. Utah 1993); Howe v. Hull, 873 F. Supp. 72, 78 (N.D.Ohio (8) Abbott v. Bragdon, 107 F.3d 934 (1st Cir. 1997). (9) Runnebaum v. Na......
-
Disability Law and HIV Criminalization.
...also authorizes a fine of up to $5,000. Id. [section] 17-10-4(a); see id. [section] 17-10-3(a)(1). (127.) See, e.g., T.E.P. v. Leavitt, 840 F. Supp. 110, 111 (D. Utah 1993) (invalidating Utah's ban on marriage for people with HIV/AIDS and permanently enjoining (128.) Doe v. Cty. of Centre, ......