Terry v. State, 43346
| Decision Date | 19 April 1965 |
| Docket Number | No. 43346,43346 |
| Parties | Jessie TERRY v. STATE of Mississippi. |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Robert B. Smith, Ripley, for appellant.
Joe T. Patterson, Atty. Gen., by G. Garland Lyell, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.
Jessie Terry appellant, was convicted in the Circuit Court of Lee County of the the possession of intoxicating liquor, second offense, find $500 and sentenced to six months in the county jail. Miss. Code Ann. Sec. 2613(b) (1956). The question is whether the search and seizure of the liquor in appellant's automobile was valid. This includes the issues of whether there was probable cause for the search when the officers were acting on a telephone call from an anoymous informant, and whether the arrest began before appellant drove his automobile recklessly and at high speed in an attempt to evade the officers.
On the night in question, Sheriff Webb, Deputy Sheriff Moore, and Constable Wilson were together at a truck stop. Wilson obtained information from an anoymous telephone caller that Jessie Terry would be traveling a certain road in his automobile around 4:30 a. m. making a delivery of whiskey. The anonymous information indicated, and the officers thought that this whiskey would be delivered to a particular bootlegger in that vincinty. Accordingly, the three officers parked their car on a side road in the country and waited for Terry to pass in his automobile, the description of which they knew. At 4:20 a. m. a car of that description, given to the constable by the anoymous informer, proceeded down the road headed toward the bootlegger's house. At this time Terry was violating no law. The plan of the officers was for Terry to drive into the bootlegger's yard, and they would then catch him. The officers had no search warrant for appellant's car, and no warrant for his arrest.
Instead of Terry turning into this place, he pulled over to the side of the road, stopped and turned his car lights off. When the officers saw that Terry was not turning into the bootlegger's driveway, they moved on up the road, came into view of Terry's car, and gave a 'signal or warning' with two red lights on the front of the sheriff's car. At the time this was done, Terry was not violating any law. The sheriff said when he pulled his automobile into the road toward Terry, he wanted to see what was going on.
With the two red lights shining on the front of the sheriff's car, at night on the country road, Terry started up his car and drove away at a high rate of speed, chased by the officers. He turned over after running about three miles, and the officers found several cases of whiskey in his vehicle. This was the evidence used in this case.
The sheriff said that after Terry's car passed the bootlegger's house, 'I was after the automobile that Mr. Terry was driving from then on.' His sole purpose in waiting out there two hours on the night in question was to catch Terry with the whiskey. Asked whether he gave any warning signal to defendant that he was pursuing him, the sheriff said, 'I had my red light on two of them that sets (sic) in front of the car.' Deputy Sheriff Moore said that two or three minutes after Terry's car passed them, they drove toward the bootlegger's house; that they came up behind him, with the police red lights on the front of their car; and that then Terry, who was stopped, took off in a burst of speed.
Mississippi Constitution article 3, section 23 (1890) provides that the people shall be secure 'from unreasonable seizure or search; and no warrant shall be issued without probable cause * * *.' Mississippi Code Annotated section 2615 (1956), recognizing that automobiles provide a particular problem, states that the sheriff and other officers have the power, if they have reason to believe that intoxicating liquor is being transported in volation of law in any automobile, to make a reasonable search of the vehicle, to seize the liquor, and to arrest the person in possession thereof.
However, such search of a vehicle without authority of law must be based upon probable cause, supported by information from a credible person. The facts upon which the officer acts must be sufficient to constitute probable cause, and this is a judicial question for the decision of the court. Defendant's counsel is entitled to know who gave the information, and to obtain a full disclosure of the facts upon which the officer acted, in order to present the issue of whether there was probable cause. Mapp v. State, 148 Miss. 739, 114 So. 825 (1927).
The...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Mitchell v. State
...began when McKaig spoke to Mitchell in his backyard, in accordance with Pollard v. State, 233 So.2d 792 (Miss.1970); Terry v. State, 252 Miss. 479, 173 So.2d 889 (1965); and Smith v. State, 240 Miss. 738, 128 So.2d 857 (1961). However this pursuit did not result in arrest. Instead it result......
-
Hill v. State, 53795
...obtained as a result of an illegal arrest is inadmissible. See Pollard v. State, 233 So.2d 792 (Miss.1970); and Terry v. State, 252 Miss. 479, 173 So.2d 889 (1965). In Dover v. State, 227 So.2d 296 (Miss.1969), the Sheriff of Quitman County obtained a confession from the accused on a Saturd......
-
Rooks v. State
...did not constitute probable cause for a search warrant of the defendant's premises. We adopted this same reasoning in Terry v. State, 252 Miss. 479, 173 So.2d 889 (1965), when we held that an anonymous telephone call to the sheriff that the defendant would be driving a car on a certain road......
-
Haddox v. State, 91-KA-00652
...have a reasonable suspicion that the accused is involved in a felony. Floyd v. State, 500 So.2d 989, 993 (Miss.1986). Terry v. State, 252 Miss. 479, 173 So.2d 889 (1965), involved a pursuit and pull-over by a police car. The court stated that the search begins when the pursuit to make the a......