Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. Holborn Oil Co. Ltd.
| Decision Date | 05 February 1985 |
| Citation | 484 N.Y.S.2d 834,108 A.D.2d 607 |
| Parties | TESORO PETROLEUM CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HOLBORN OIL COMPANY LIMITED, et al., Defendants-Appellants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
A.B. Donnellan, Jr., New York City, for plaintiff-respondent.
A.B. Gilbert, New York City, for defendants-appellants.
Before SULLIVAN, J.P., and ROSS, ASCH and KASSAL, JJ.
Order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 31, 1984, which, inter alia, denied defendants' motion to dismiss the fourth cause of action in the complaint, is reversed, on the law, to the extent appealed from, and the motion by defendants to dismiss the fourth cause of action granted, without costs.
Plaintiff alleged in its complaint breach of contract by defendants, and in the fourth cause of action, fraud in the inducement of the contract. Plaintiff asserted that defendants' agent falsely assured plaintiff's employee that defendants would perform under the contract, and that the representation was made with the intent to deceive. However, plaintiff did not allege that defendants breached any duty owed to plaintiff separate and apart from the contractual duty when they misrepresented their intent to perform as promised. Nor has plaintiff claimed any special damages proximately caused by the false representation, not recoverable under the contract measure of damages. Consequently, the fourth cause of action was redundant and should have been dismissed.
A failure to perform promises of future acts is merely a breach of contract to be enforced by an action on the contract. A cause of action for fraud does not arise when the only fraud charged relates to a breach of contract (see Wegman v. Dairylea Coop., 50 A.D.2d 108, 113, 376 N.Y.S.2d 728, lv. dism. 38 N.Y.2d 918, 382 N.Y.S.2d 979, 346 N.E.2d 817; Miller v. Volk & Huxley, 44 A.D.2d 810, 355 N.Y.S.2d 605).
All concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Nuance Commc'ns, Inc. v. Int'l Bus. Machs. Corp.
...R.H. Damon & Co. v. Softkey Software Prods., Inc., 811 F. Supp. 986, 992 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) (citing Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. Holborn Oil Co., 108 A.D.2d 607, 484 N.Y.S.2d 834, 835 (1985) ))). But where the meaning of a contract is in doubt, courts allow a breach of contract claim and a breach......
-
Papa's-June Music, Inc. v. McLean
...v. Solmar Constr. Co., 159 A.D.2d 698, 700, 553 N.Y.S.2d 187, 189 (2d Dep't.1990); Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. Holborn Oil Co., 108 A.D.2d 607, 607, 484 N.Y.S.2d 834, 835 (1st Dep't.1985); Sudul, 868 F.Supp. at 63; Best Western Int'l, Inc., 1994 WL 465905, at *4-5; G.D. Searle & Co. v. Medico......
-
Coughlan v. Jachney
...to allege damages distinct from contract damages in order to recover on his fraud claim."); Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. Holborn Oil Co. Ltd. , 108 A.D.2d 607, 484 N.Y.S.2d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985), appeal dismissed , 65 N.Y.2d 637 (N.Y. 1985) (holding that the plaintiff's cause of action for......
-
Cronos Grp. Ltd. v. XComIP, LLC
...collateral to the contract, ... was directly related to a specific provision of the contract"]; Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. Holborn Oil Co., 108 A.D.2d 607, 607, 484 N.Y.S.2d 834 [1st Dept.1985] [dismissing a fraud claim as "redundant" where, inter alia, the plaintiff did not allege the breac......