Tetrault v. Ghibellini
Decision Date | 06 June 1944 |
Citation | 55 N.E.2d 956,316 Mass. 477 |
Parties | LUCIEN L. TETRAULT v. FRED M. GHIBELLINI. |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
May 3, 1944.
Present: FIELD, C.
J., QUA, RONAN & WILKINS, JJ.
Negligence, Invited person, Automobile service station, Contributory.
One, who entered the office of an automobile service station to make a purchase of automobile accessories on sale there and, upon asking if there was a "public rest room," was directed by an attendant to a rest room maintained in the station for the use of its customers, might properly be found to have been an invitee of the proprietor of the station in following the directions and seeking the rest room.
Evidence of the circumstances in which an invitee in an automobile service station, in following directions of an attendant to go "straight ahead" to find a rest room, entered an unlighted lubrication room and there, after taking a few steps in the dark, was injured when he fell into a grease pit instead of entering the rest room, which was located near the door of the lubrication room but not "straight ahead," warranted a finding of negligence of the attendant toward him in giving misleading directions and also in not warning him of his danger; and did not require a ruling that he was guilty of contributory negligence.
TORT. Writ in the Superior Court dated February 21, 1941. The action was tried before Goldberg, J.
W. W. Jump, for the defendant.
J. J. Kelleher, (R.
E. MacDonald with him,) for the plaintiff.
This is an action of tort for personal injuries sustained by falling into a grease pit in the defendant's automobile service station. The jury found for the plaintiff, and the defendant's exception to the denial of his motion for a directed verdict raises the questions whether there was evidence of the defendant's negligence and whether as matter of law the plaintiff was not in the exercise of due care.
The evidence tended to show the following: On June 28, 1940, after 9 P.M. the plaintiff entered the front door of the office of the defendant's service station, where automobile accessories were for sale, in order to make a purchase. In this room he "made two or three steps and reached over his head for a light and fell into the grease pit." There was a carpet the width of the front door which ran directly from the front door in a straight line to the "lube-room" door and, as appears from photographs admitted in evidence, off to the right from that carpet just before reaching the "lube-room" door there was another carpet leading at slightly more than a right angle about "three steps" to the rest room. After the attendant said "Straight ahead," the plaintiff walked approximately twelve feet in the office, which was lighted. He The unlighted room "seemed very dark to him" coming from the "well lighted" office. "When he reached for the light over his head he felt what was in front of him like a large object was a toilet bowl." The rest room was "maintained for the benefit of people who might come on the premises to buy things, for the benefit of the general public, for anybody who might come there to use the toilet."
...
To continue reading
Request your trial