Texarkana Gas & Electric Co. v. City of Texarkana
Decision Date | 02 December 1909 |
Citation | 123 S.W. 213 |
Parties | TEXARKANA GAS & ELECTRIC CO. v. CITY OF TEXARKANA. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Bowie County Court; Joe Hughes, Judge.
Action by the City of Texarkana against the Texarkana Gas & Electric Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed and rendered.
Glass, Estes, King & Burford, for appellant. F. M. Ball and R. P. Dorough, for appellee.
The appellant is a private corporation, is now and has been for many years engaged in the business of operating an electric street car system and an electric light plant in the city of Texarkana, Tex., for the purpose of furnishing to the residents of said city street car service and electric lights. In carrying on its business it has erected and uses poles and wires placed and strung in the manner usually adopted in such cases. In the early part of 1907, the city of Texarkana procured from the Legislature a special charter. Prior to that time and since 1874 it had existed as a municipality incorporated under the general laws of the state. On February 10, 1908, the city adopted an ordinance entitled, "An ordinance to regulate the placing of poles and stringing of wires thereon along, over and through the streets and alleys and other public highways of the city of Texarkana, Texas; providing for a license and a license fee upon every such pole, and providing for the collection of the same." It is then ordained, first, "That any such person, firm, corporation or association owning, operating or conducting any of the following public service, business or engagements to or with the general public or offering to do so for hire within the corporate limits of the said city or partially within and partially without the corporate limits of the said city, viz., telegraph business, telephone business, or telegraph and telephone business, or electric light or electric street railway, or either or both, or any other business where electric wires are used and suspended on poles over, along or across any of the public streets, alleys or highways, within the said city, shall be and each is hereby required to pay to the said city for the use and benefit of the street and bridge fund a license fee of fifty (50¢) cents for each and every pole that is or may be owned by any such person, firm, corporation or association and occupying any street, alley or public highway or standing and erected thereon, and upon every said pole an annual license and license fee is here levied and assessed for the year 1908 and for each succeeding year thereafter." Then follow provisions intended as regulations governing the location of the poles upon the streets and alleys, their size and position, distance and height, and other details generally imposed by cities, and which it is not necessary to mention here more fully. The second subdivision is as follows: On the 20th of February, 1908, the general manager of the appellant company, in compliance with the provisions of the foregoing...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Fleming
...Mayor, etc., of City of Houston v. Houston City St. Ry. Co., 83 Tex. 548, 19 S.W. 127, 29 Am.St.Rep. 679; Texarkana Gas & Electric Co. v. Texarkana, 58 Tex.Civ.App. 109, 123 S.W. 213; City of Vernon v. Montgomery, Tex.Civ.App., 265 S.W. 188, writ refused; Corpus Christi Gas Co. v. Corpus Ch......
-
Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. City of Everett
... ... and collected upon each telegraph, telephone, electric light ... or [97 Wash. 263] other pole in or upon any street, alley or ... other public ... 259; Hot Springs Elec. L. Co. v. Hot ... Springs, 70 Ark. 300, 67 S.W. 761; Texarkana Gas & ... Elec. Co. v. City of Texarkana, 58 Tex.Civ.App. 109, 123 ... S.W. 213; City ... ...
-
Fink v. City of Clarendon
...and, hence, appellee could not deprive itself by contract of some power it never possessed. Texarkana Gas & Electric Co. v. City of Texarkana, 123 S. W. 213, 58 Tex. Civ. App. 109. It is true that in City of Uvalde et al. v. Uvalde Electric & Ice Co., supra, it is held that the city was wit......
-
Invader Oil & Refining Co. v. City of Fort Worth
...v. Dorr, 136 Mo. 370, 37 S. W. 1108; City of Houston v. City Ry. Co., 83 Tex. 548, 19 S. W. 127; Texarkana Gas & Electric Co. v. City of Texarkana, 58 Tex. Civ. App. 109, 123 S. W. 213; Krause et al. v. City of El Paso, 101 Tex. 211, 106 S. W. 121, 14 L. R. A. (N. S.) 582, 130 Am. St. Rep. ......