Texas Dept. of Public Safety v. Gentry
| Decision Date | 03 February 1965 |
| Docket Number | No. A-10250,A-10250 |
| Citation | 386 S.W.2d 758 |
| Parties | TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Petitioner, v. Farris GENTRY, Respondent. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Joe Resweber, County Atty., and Charles J. Wilson, Asst. County Atty., Houston, for petitioner.
Donald Lasof and Charles Coussons, Jr., Houston, for respondent.
Following a determination by the Houston Corporation Court No. 3 that Farris Gentry, respondent, was an habitual violator of the traffic law as defined by Article 6687b, Section 22(b), Vernon's Ann.Tex.Civ.Stat., the Department of Public Safety ordered his driver's license suspended for a period of three months. Respondent appealed to the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County, and that court rendered summary judgment upholding the suspension. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed such judgment and remanded the cause for a new trial. 379 S.W.2d 114.
The Court of Civil Appeals held: (1) that the judgments convicting respondent of moving traffic violations can be impeached in this proceeding by showing that he did not appear in open court either in person or by counsel and that there was no forfeiture of bail deposited to secure his appearance in court; and (2) that respondent's affidavit also raises an issue of fact as to whether he is the person who was adjudged guilty of the violation which occurred on April 4, 1961. We do not agree with either of these conclusions. The first is contrary to our holding in Texas Department of Public Safety v. Richardson, Tex.Sup., 384 S.W.2d 128, and in our opinion respondent's affidavit does not state or even suggest that he is not the person who was charged in the case involving the violation of April 4, 1961.
This record differs in one significant respect, however, from the one considered in the Richardson case. The motion for summary judgment there was supported by properly authenticated copies of four notices of conviction for moving traffic violations occurring within a period of one year. Since the notices of conviction are admissible in evidence under the provisions of Article 3731a, Vernon's Ann.Tex.Civ.Stat., the authenticated copies thereof were properly before the court on the motion for summary judgment. We held that the notices of conviction would be presumed to reflect the provisions of the respective judgments upon which they were based.
The present record does not contain copies of either the notices of conviction or the judgments of conviction. Petitioner's motion...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Northwest Oil Co. v. Railroad Commission
...1926); Gentry v. Texas Department of Public Safety, 379 S.W.2d 114, 119 (Tex.Civ.App.--Houston, 1964) error ref. n.r.e., 386 S.W.2d 758 (Tex.Sup., 1965). Furthermore, the attack here was direct, not collateral. Crawford v. McDonald, 88 Tex. 626, 33 S.W. 325, 327 We are in entire agreement w......
-
Dews v. Floyd
...1935, writ ref.); Gentry v. Texas Department of Public Safety, 379 S.W.2d 114, 199, (Tex.Civ.App., Houston, 1964, writ ref., n.r.e., 386 S.W.2d 758). In Commander v. Bryan, supra, the court 'Nor will a void judgment be given effect of res adjudicata in a subsequent suit involving the same s......
-
Gentile v. State
...in which appellant was convicted and cannot be presumed to reflect the terms of the judgments in those cases. Texas Dep't of Pub. Safety v. Gentry, 386 S.W.2d 758, 760 (Tex.1965); Texas Dep't of Pub. Safety v. Davis, 680 S.W.2d 875, 878 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1984, no writ). The Sta......
-
Crowe v. Texas Department of Public Safety, s. 7563
...Safety v. Richardson, Tex., 384 S.W.2d 128; Texas Department of Public Safety v. Miller, Tex., 386 S.W.2d 760; Texas Department of Public Safety v. Gentry, Tex., 386 S.W.2d 758. We have carefully considered all of appellants' assignments of error and overruled all of them. Judgment of the t......