Texas Emp. Ins. Ass'n v. Scroggins, 7172
| Decision Date | 16 June 1959 |
| Docket Number | No. 7172,7172 |
| Citation | 326 S.W.2d 606 |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
| Parties | TEXAS EMPLOYERS' INSURANCE ASS'N, Appellant, v. Warren C. SCROGGINS, Appellee. |
Otto A. Ritter, Kenley, Sharp, Ritter & Boyland, Longview, for appellant.
William A. Badders, Fulmer, Fairchild & Badders, Nacogdoches, for appellee.
Plaintiff-appellee sued appellant-defendant in the District Court of Panola County. He employed the law firm of Fulmer, Fairchild & Badders to represent him and in the trial of the case he recovered a judgment. The judgment recited that a part of same was to be paid to the attorneys. Since the transcript has been filed in this Court, appellant has filed a motion suggesting that the judgment of the trial court appealed from is null and void for the reason that the Honorable Ward Chandler is a first cousin to the wife of the Honorable Vernis Fulmer. To this motion is attached an affidavit by the Honorable Ward Chandler verifying such fact.
This case comes squarely within the relationship prohibited by Sec. 11, Art. 5, of the Constitution of this State, Vernon's Ann.St., and the violation of Art. 15 of Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, and Postal Mutual Indemnity Co. v. Ellis, 140 Tex. 570, 169 S.W.2d 482. It will not be necessary to discuss the facts further than to say that the degree of relationship comes within the prohibited degree because of the Workmen's Compensation Act, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes, art. 8306 et seq. and the further fact that the attorney's fee was awarded in the judgment.
The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. McGee
...he was not a party to and directly interested in the controversial issues thus presented. * * *' See also Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. Scroggins, Tex.Civ.App., 326 S.W.2d 606 (no writ The Court of Civil Appeals does not quarrel with this reasoning, but in essence holds that Ward Step......