Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Arnold, 6551.
Decision Date | 11 December 1935 |
Docket Number | No. 6551.,6551. |
Citation | 88 S.W.2d 473 |
Parties | TEXAS EMPLOYERS' INS. ASS'N v. ARNOLD. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Lawther, Cox & Cramer, Shelby S. Cox, and James P. Swift, all of Dallas, for plaintiff in error.
Bailey, Nickels & Bailey, of Dallas, for defendant in error.
For a partial statement of the nature and result of this case, we adopt the following clear statement from the opinion of Justice Looney, speaking for the Court of Civil Appeals:
The judgment of the trial court was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 57 S. W.(2d) 954.
It is undisputed that an agreed judgment, dated August 21, 1929, was entered in the district court of Dallas county, in favor of Arnold against the Texas Employers' Insurance Association, for the sum of $1,300. A full settlement of this judgment was made by the insurance company to Arnold and his attorneys. That judgment was in all respects final. Thereafter Arnold sought to set aside the aforementioned judgment, on the ground of fraud and misrepresentations as to his physical condition. In order to set aside this judgment, the duty rests upon Arnold to allege and prove fraud, mistake, or accident, and diligence on his part, and that he has been deprived of his rights without his fault. Courts of equity may retry the case, set aside the judgment, and grant appropriate relief warranted by pleading and proof on the entire case. In such proceeding for relief against the judgment, every issue must be disposed of, and relief denied or granted. In the case of Humphrey et al. v. Harrell et al. (Tex.Com. App.) 29 S.W.(2d) 963, 964, the following principles were announced:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bridgman v. Moore
...Ass'n v. Reddin, Tex.Com.App., 49 S.W.2d 1095; Hermann Hospital Estate v. Nachant, Tex. Civ.App., 55 S.W.2d 505; Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. Arnold, Tex.Sup., 88 S.W.2d 473; Hubbard v. Tallal, Tex.Com.App., 92 S.W.2d 1022; Owens v. Foley, 42 Tex. Civ.App. 49, 93 S.W. 1003; Lyon-Taylor Co.......
-
Hanks v. Rosser
...S.W.2d 1095(4, 5) approved by Supreme Court; Honey v. Wood, 46 S.W.2d 334 (Tex.Civ.App., 1934, n. w. h.); Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Arnold, 126 Tex. 466, 88 S.W.2d 473 (1935); Mann v. Risher (1938), 131 Tex. 498, 116 S.W.2d 692(5); Garcia v. Jones, 155 S.W.2d 671 (Tex.Civ.App., 1941, w......
-
In re I.V., 13-00-026-CV
...the former judgment, and substitute a new judgment which properly adjudicates the entire controversy. Tex. Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Arnold, 126 Tex. 466, 88 S.W.2d 473, 474 (1935); Crabtree v. Crabtree, 627 S.W.2d 486, 487 (Tex. App-Corpus Christi 1981, no Smith v. Smith, 468 S.W.2d 139, 14......
-
Kessler v. Kessler
...it is attacked, and substitute therefor a new judgment which properly adjudicates the entire controversy. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Arnold, 126 Tex. 466, 88 S.W.2d 473 (1935); Humphrey v. Harrell, 29 S.W.2d 963 (Tex.Comm.App.1930); Crabtree v. Crabtree, 627 S.W.2d 486 (Tex.App.--Corpus......