Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. Williams, 5428

Decision Date17 April 1975
Docket NumberNo. 5428,5428
PartiesTEXAS EMPLOYERS' INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. James Earl WILLIAMS et al., Appellees.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Grant Liser, Fort Worth, for appellant.

Dushman, Greenspan, Kensel & Friedman, Fort Worth (Lowell E. Dushman--Jack Friedman, Fort Worth), for appellees.

OPINION

JAMES, Justice.

This is a workmen's compensation case involving death benefits. Plaintiff-Appellant Texas Employers' Insurance Association brought this suit in the nature of an interpleader action in the District Court of Johnson County, Texas, against James Earl Williams, (a minor), Freeman Brown, L. E. Spellman, and Lowell E. Dushman, (attorney).

The death benefits grew out of the death of Mrs. Doris Ann Brown, a workman who died on or about July 10, 1973, from injuries growing out of her employment with Gearhart-Owen Industries, Inc. Defendant-Appellee James Earl Williams was the minor son of the deceased, about ten years of age. Defendant Freeman Brown was the lawful husband of the deceased. Defendant L. E. Spellman's connection with the deceased is not shown by the record. Defendant Lowell E. Dushman was the attorney representing the minor James Earl Williams.

The minor acting through his paternal grandmother, Mrs. Odessa Williams, as next friend, as well as Brown and Spellman each filed their respective notices of injury and claims for compensation with the Industrial Accident Board of the State of Texas, against Plaintiff-Appellant as the workmen's compensation carrier of the deceased's employer.

On March 6, 1974, the Board made its final decision and award, wherein the minor James Earl Williams was allowed maximum death benefits, same being $49.00 per week for 360 weeks, less $500.00 funeral expenses previously paid by Plaintiff-Appellant. The claims of Brown and Spellman were denied. A portion of the minor's award was allowed to Mr. Dushman as the minor's attorney.

While the claims were pending before the Board, Mrs. Odessa Williams, the paternal grandmother of the minor, was duly appointed and qualified as guardian of his person and estate. The award to the minor was ordered by the Board to be paid to said guardian.

Plaintiff-Appellant carrier brought this suit to set aside the Board's award under the provisions of Article 8307, Section 5, Vernon's Ann.Texas Revised Civil Statutes, making as Defendants the minor James Earl Williams, Brown, Spellman, and Attorney Dushman. In effect, the Plaintiff-Appellant carrier admitted that it owed maximum death benefits, tendered the necessary funds into court, and sought a judgment authorizing payment to the proper party or parties in such amount or amounts as the court deemed proper.

The guardian was not named as a party defendant, but on the other hand the minor himself was named as a party defendant, and was personally served with citation herein.

Thereafter the minor, James Earl Williams, acting through his attorney, filed a 'Plea in Bar,' asserting that Plaintiff-Appellant failed to properly perfect its appeal from the Boards' award by suing the minor instead of the guardian, and by so doing the court was deprived of jurisdiction over the cause insofar as the minor is concerned. Subject to the plea in bar the minor filed his answer, after which followed a cross-action filed by the guardian in behalf of the minor against the Plaintiff-Appellant ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Hungate v. Hungate
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • October 29, 1975
    ...1915, no writ); Davilla v. State, 477 S.W.2d 410 (Tex.Civ.App.--Amarillo 1972, no writ); Texas Employers' Insurance Association v. Williams, 522 S.W.2d 549 (Tex.Civ.App.--Waco 1975, writ ref'd n.r.e.). There being no showing of Nebraska law on collateral attacks, it is presumed to be the sa......
  • Abdnor v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • August 16, 1988
    ...not the facts in Abdnor's case. We do not view Knighton as controlling. Abdnor also cites Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n v. Williams, 522 S.W.2d 549 (Tex.Civ.App.--Waco 1975, writ ref'd n.r.e.) for the purpose of showing that a guardian has an obligation to defend his ward against lawsuits......
  • Peek v. DeBerry
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • October 30, 1991
    ...answer in his representative capacity. Pucket v. Johnson, 45 Tex. at 551. Appellants rely on Texas Employers' Ins. Assoc. v. Williams, 522 S.W.2d 549 (Tex.Civ.App.--Waco 1975, writ ref'd n.r.e.), as support for their theory of waiver of service. The waiver in Williams, however, resulted bec......
  • Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. Sarver
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • December 11, 1975
    ...this precise question is one of first impression. A somewhat similar situation is found in Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. Williams, 522 S.W.2d 549 (Tex.Civ.App.--Waco 1975, writ ref'd n.r.e.). In this case T.E.I.A. appealed naming the minor himself as one of the party defendants, and n......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT