Texas General Indem. Co. v. Villanueva

Decision Date25 June 1981
Docket NumberNo. 1733,1733
PartiesTEXAS GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Roberto VILLANUEVA, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals
OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

This is a workmen's compensation case in which Texas General Indemnity Company, appellant, is appealing the judgment of the trial court which awarded appellee, Roberto Villanueva, $3,741.69 in compensation benefits. Trial was to a jury, and judgment was entered in accordance with the jury findings.

On May 30, 1973, Roberto Villanueva suffered an on-the-job injury to his knee while in the course and scope of employment for PPG Industries, Inc. Villanueva reported the injury to his employer, on the day of the accident, and an accident report was filed. Villanueva continued working after the accident; however, his injury eventually led to his hospitalization and surgery about one year later, in August of 1974. This hospitalization and surgery was paid for by Texas General Indemnity Company under Villanueva's workmens' compensation policy. During the resulting convalescent period, the insurance Company paid Villanueva compensation benefits. On May 8, 1975, Villanueva received a lump sum payment from the Insurance Company for 15% Permanent Partial Disability to his leg. Accompanying this check was a letter which in part read:

"THIS CASE REMAINS OPEN BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT BOARD.

Please call our office or the Board if your require additional medical treatment or become disabled as a result of this injury."

Villanueva first saw his attorney on December 8, 1975. A letter was sent to the Industrial Accident Board notifying the board that a compensation claim was pending before the Board, and that Villanueva desired to claim additional compensation. Later, a formal notice of claim was sent on January 26, 1976, to the Industrial Accident Board by his attorney.

The appellant Insurance Company alleges that Villanueva did not file a claim within six months from the date of his injury, and if a claim was filed, good cause did not exist for such a late filing. On appeal appellant Insurance Company is contending that the trial court erred in submitting special issues to the jury because there was no evidence regarding: (1) whether Villanueva believed a claim for compensation had been filed with the Board, (2) that such belief constituted good cause for his delay in the actual filing of a claim, and (3) whether or not good cause existed up to the date of the filing of his claim. Appellant argues additionally that these issues were improper because there was no evidence as to the date when a claim was filed with the Board.

In a workmens' compensation action, the claimant must plead and prove that he timely presented his claim to the Industrial Accident Board within six months after the occurrence of the accident. If there existed a delay in the filing of the claim, the claimant must show that good cause existed for his failure to file a claim within the statutory period. When a claim is not presented within the six-month period, the claimant must show that good cause for late filing continued up until the date when the claim was actually filed. Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 8307 § 4a (1979); Lee v. Houston Fire and Casualty Insurance Corp., 530 S.W.2d 294 (Tex.1975); Texas Employers' Insurance Assoc. v. Herron, 569 S.W.2d 549 (Tex.Civ.App. Corpus Christi 1978, no writ).

Rule 277, T.R.C.P., requires the trial court to submit the special issues that control the disposition of the case and that are raised by the pleadings and the evidence. In this regard, a trial court is permitted broad discretion in the submission of such special issues. Wood v. Texas Farmers Insurance Co., 593 S.W.2d 777 (Tex.Civ.App....

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Mexico's Industries, Inc. v. Banco Mexico Somex, S.N.C.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 7 Julio 1993
    ...determination. Baker Marine Corp. v. Moseley, 645 S.W.2d 486, 489 (Tex.App.--Corpus Christi 1982, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Texas Gen. Indem. Co. v. Villanueva, 619 S.W.2d 15, 17 (Tex.Civ.App.--Corpus Christi 1981, no writ); see also TEX.R.CIV.P. The Bank points to the following passage to argue ......
  • Baker Marine Corp. v. Moseley
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 26 Agosto 1982
    ...the evidence. In this regard, the trial court is permitted broad discretion in the submission of such special issues." Texas Gen. Indem. Co. v. Villanueva, 619 S.W.2d 15 (Tex.Civ.App.--Corpus Christi 1981, no writ). Special Issue No. 1 as submitted inquired into the existence of employment ......
  • Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Hernandez
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 17 Junio 1982
    ...Antonio 1979, no writ). The 1973 amendments to Rule 277 T.R.C.P. permits broader submission of special issues, See Texas Gen. Indem. Co. v. Villanueva, 619 S.W.2d 15 (Tex.Civ.App.--Corpus Christi 1981, no writ); State v. Norris, 550 S.W.2d 386 (Tex.Civ.App.--Corpus Christi 1977, writ ref'd ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT