Texas General Indemnity Company v. McIlvain

Decision Date17 January 1968
Docket NumberNo. 24,24
Citation424 S.W.2d 56
PartiesTEXAS GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Alpha McILVAIN et vir, Appellees. . Houston (14th Dist.)
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Raybourne Thompson, Jr., B. Jeff Crane, Jr ., Vinson, Elkins, Weems & Searls, Houston, for appellant.

George E. Pletcher, Helm, Jones & Pletcher, Houston, for appellees .

BARRON, Justice.

This is a workmen's compensation suit. Plaintiffs are Mrs. Alpha McIlvain and husband, Ottis Eugene McIlvain, and the defendant is Texas General Indemnity Company, compensation insurer of Sidney Meyers, Inc. Mrs. McIlvain was an employee working in the meat department, and at the time of the accident she was weighing packaged meat when she was suddenly injured in the area of her back which caused a numbness in her left leg.

After a hearing the jury awarded Mrs. McIlvain $14,030.30 for total permanent incapacity by reason of her on-the-job injuries. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiffs on the verdict. Defendant filed motions for instructed verdict and motion for new trial, all of which attacked the trial court's rulings and special issues numbers 3, 4 and 5, inquiring whether Mrs. McIlvain's belief that she was employed by J. Weingarten, Inc., constituted good cause for her failure to file her claim for compensation before she actually did file it on January 14, 1964. The motions were overruled.

Defendant timely perfected its appeal to this court. Texas General Indemnity Company is appellant here and Mrs. McIlvain and her husband are appellees.

The evidence is undisputed that Mrs. McIlvain received her injuries on January 26, 1961. She became a full time employee for Weingarten in 1956, and in 1957, she was transferred to Sidney Meyers, Inc., a separate corporation from Weingarten, but having extensive business relations with Weingarten in connection with its various operations in Harris County. It is uncontroverted that Mrs. McIlvain was in the employ of Sidney Meyers, Inc., at all times material to this suit until after her injury on January 26, 1961. She received regular paychecks and other items in connection therewith on forms marked 'Sidney Meyers, Inc.' There is ample testimony in the record which shows that Mrs. McIlvain had reason to believe that she worked for Weingarten. The warehouse in which she worked was marked 'Weingarten's' and her supervisor was an employee of that firm. Her personnel records were kept by Weingarten employees, and employees with whom she dealt were those of Weingarten. She was sent to a doctor by Weingarten's personnel office and the latter firm paid the doctors a portion of their bills . The address of the warehouse where Mrs. McIlvain was injured is the same as Weingarten's general office, J. Weingarten, Inc., and Weingarten's Bakery. There are other facts in the record which might cause her to believe that she was an employee of J. Weingarten, Inc.

The record further shows, however, that subsequent to appellee's injury of January 26, 1961, she took no action and talked with no one concerning her legal rights prior to contacting her attorney shortly before August 31, 1961. She took no action to ascertain her rights within six months immediately subsequent to her injury. She filed no claim and did not attempt to file one within the six month period provided by Article 8307, Sec. 4a.

Appellees contend, however, that if Mrs. McIlvain's belief that she was employed by Weingarten was justified as the jury found, her rights and duties must be tested as such would exist under her belief, and that prompt filing of a compensation claim is excused. The fact is that J. Weingarten, Inc., has never carried Workmen's Compensation insurance at any time material to this case. It is asserted that since appellee had no rights under the Workmen's Compensation Act insofar as J. Weingarten, Inc., is concerned, Mrs. McIlvain could have no obligations thereunder, and that appellee had a limitation period of two years to make her claim by suit against Weingarten. On August 31, 1961, seven months after appellee's accident, her attorney inquired of the Board whether J. Weingarten, Inc., and/or Weingarten's Delicatessen Warehouse were subscribers under the Workmen's Compensation Act. In September, 1961, the Board informed her attorney neither was a subscriber. On the basis of information supplied by appellee as to the identity of her employer, on October 5, 1961, her attorney filed a common law action against J. Weingarten, Inc. During January, 1964, the attorney was informed by counsel for Weingarten that Mrs. McIlvain was employed by Sidney Meyers, Inc. After being so notified, her attorney, on January 14, 1964, filed appellee's claim with the Board pursuant to Article 8307, Sec. 4a. There is no testimony in the record that Mrs. McIlvain knew her former employer, Weingarten, had...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Villarreal v. Aetna Insurance Company
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 31 d3 Março d3 1971
    ...v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n, 438 S.W.2d 678 (Tex.Civ.App .--Eastland 1968, no writ); Texas General Indemnity Co. v. McIlvain, 424 S.W.2d 56 (Tex.Civ.App.--Houston (14th) 1968, writ ref'd); Nunnery v. Texas Casualty Ins. Co., The record shows as a matter of law that no good cause existed ......
  • Robbins v. Maryland Am. General Ins. Co., 655
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 7 d4 Outubro d4 1971
    ...discovered that the above policy of workmen's compensation insurance had been issued. We do not believe that Texas General Indemnity Company v. McIlvain, 424 S.W.2d 56 (Tex.Civ.App., Houston 14th 1968, wr. ref.), is controlling of appellee's counterpoint. There the court held as a matter of......
  • Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wilson
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 24 d2 Abril d2 1973
    ...Texas Employers' Insurance Association v. Brantley, 402 S.W.2d 140 (Tex.Sup.1966); Texas General Indemnity Co. v. McIlvain, 424 S.W.2d 56 (Tex.Civ.App.Houston 14th, 1968, writ ref'd). The proof is overwhelming, and the fact is conceded, that Mrs. Wilson had knowledge of her injury at all pe......
  • Edwards v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 31 d1 Dezembro d1 1973
    ... ... LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee ... Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, ... Brantley, 402 S.W.2d 140 (Tex.Sup.1966); Texas General Indemnity Co. v. McIlvain, ... 424 S.W.2d 56 (Tex.Civ.App ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT