Texas Midland R. R. v. Griggs
Decision Date | 30 November 1907 |
Citation | 106 S.W. 411 |
Parties | TEXAS MIDLAND R. R. v. GRIGGS. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Ellis County Court; J. T. Spence, Judge.
Action by Susan Griggs against the Texas Midland Railroad. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed and rendered.
Ogden, Brooks & Napier, A. H. Dashiell and Edw. H. Wicks, for appellant. Jack & Jack, for appellee.
Appellee, Susan Griggs, sued the appellant in the county court of Ellis county to recover the sum of $1,000 as damages alleged to have been sustained by her through the negligence and wrongful acts of appellant's agent. She avers, in substance, that on the morning of the 5th day of January, 1906, she went to the railroad depot of appellant at Alsdorf, and entered the waiting room and asked for a ticket over appellant's road to Rosser, Tex.; that the agent of appellant refused to sell her a ticket, and that after she had remained in the depot for some time said agent told her to leave, which she did, and he closed said depot, and did not open it again until about 15 minutes before the arrival of the train upon which she desired to take passage; that, by reason of being required to leave appellant's depot, she was exposed to the cold weather, made sick, and suffered much physical or bodily pain. Appellant pleaded a general denial, and specially that it was in no way instrumental in causing the sickness and suffering of appellee; that, if she was sick and suffered as alleged, the same was wholly due to causes other than any act or omission on the part of appellant; that its depot and waiting room were open for an hour before the arrival and for an hour after the departure of all passenger trains due to arrive and depart from its station Alsdorf on the day in question. The case was tried by the court without a jury, and resulted in a judgment for appellee in the sum of $150.
There is no statement of facts in the record, but the trial court filed the following conclusions of fact: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Flaiz v. Moore
... ... Jack Bernard MOORE, Sr., et al., Appellees ... No. 13850 ... Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio ... Jan. 3, 1962 ... Rehearing Denied Jan. 31, 1962 ... J. G ... ...
-
Reynolds v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company
... ... Mo. 182; Railroad v. Laloge, 113 Ky. 896, 62 L. R ... A. 405; Railroad v. Griggs (Tex.), 106 S.W. 411. (3) ... The duty of a railroad company to light its premises is ... ...
-
Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. Brown
...and that of the train, even prior to the time of his actual purchase of the ticket entitling him to transportation. Texas Midland R. R. Co. v. Griggs, 106 S. W. 411; 4 R. C. L. 1033. The evidence here is conclusive that appellee was in defendant's depot, intending to board its train, and th......
-
International & G. N. R. Co. v. Doolan
...as required therein, to keep said depot warm for an hour before and after the departure of its trains. Texas Midland R. R. Co. v. Griggs (Tex. Civ. App.) 106 S. W. 411; Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Ry. Co. v. Turner (Tex. Civ. App.) 93 S. W. 195. Third. By their first proposition under said as......