Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Leighty
Decision Date | 04 November 1895 |
Citation | 32 S.W. 515 |
Parties | TEXAS & P. RY. CO. v. LEIGHTY et al. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Action by Mrs. E. A. Leighty and others against the Texas & Pacific Railway Company for injuries causing the death of E. A. Leighty. From a judgment of the court of civil appeals affirming a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant brings error. Affirmed.
Dillard & Muse, for plaintiff in error. Taylor, Galloway & McGrady, for defendants in error.
On the night of March 23, 1892, Emmet A. Leighty, engineer of a freight train on the road of plaintiff in error, while running his engine along the main track, through the yard limits of Choctaw siding, ran the same against the tender of an engine that had been left standing partly on the main track and partly on a side track, connected with said main track by a switch, whereby his engine was overturned, inflicting upon him injuries resulting in his death. The tender had been left as above stated by Brown, a hostler at Choctaw switch, without any lights thereon to indicate its position, and the night was dark. Defendants in error sued for damages resulting to them from the death of Leighty.
On the trial, plaintiff in error introduced in evidence a rule which had been duly promulgated by it at its date, under circumstances charging Leighty with notice thereof, as follows, to wit:
Plaintiff in error requested the court to give the following charge: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
St. Louis & S.F.R. Co. v. Ault
... ... Block, 86 Miss. 426; ... Railroad Co. v. Brown, 77 Miss. 338, 29 So. 949; ... Railroad Co. v. Thomas, 51 Miss. 637; Railroad ... Co. v. Leighty, 88 Tex. 606, 32 S.W. 515; Lake Shore ... v. Parker, 23 N.E. 237; Railroad Co. v ... Humphreys, 83 Miss. 734; Stevens v. Railroad ... Co., 81 ... ...
-
Williamson v. Wabash R. Co.
... ... Ill.App. 457, 11 N.E.2d 610, certiorari denied, 304 U.S. 560, ... 58 S.Ct. 942, 82 L.Ed. 1528; Shepard v. Payne, 60 ... Utah 140; Texas R. Co. v. Leighty, 88 Tex. 604, 32 ... S.W. 515; Miller v. Central R. Co. of N.J., 58 F.2d ... 635; Gildner v. B. & O. Co., 90 F.2d 635; Rocco ... ...
-
Williamson v. Wabash Railroad Co., 39672.
...457, 11 N.E. (2d) 610, certiorari denied, 304 U.S. 560, 58 S. Ct. 942, 82 L. Ed. 1528; Shepard v. Payne, 60 Utah, 140; Texas R. Co. v. Leighty, 88 Tex. 604, 32 S.W. 515; Miller v. Central R. Co. of N.J., 58 Fed. (2d) 635; Gildner v. B. & O. Co., 90 Fed. (2d) 635; Rocco v. Lehigh Valley R. C......
-
Tabert v. Zier
...of the elevator. This instruction was likewise correct. Shepard v. Payne (1922), 60 Utah 140, 206 P. 1098; Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. Leighty (1895), 88 Tex. 604, 32 S.W. 515. The trial court properly instructed on both the plaintiff's and defendant's position relative to what the d......