Thames v. State, 1D99-1171.
| Decision Date | 28 September 2000 |
| Docket Number | No. 1D99-1171.,1D99-1171. |
| Citation | 769 So.2d 448 |
| Parties | Oliver THAMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Appellant, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, James W. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
The appellant appeals the denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) in which he argues that his sentence is illegal because the trial court improperly retained jurisdiction over his case in violation of Section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1981). We reverse and remand for further consideration in light of our recent opinion in Hampton v. State, 764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).
REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Amazon v. State, 2D03-4440.
...DCA 2003); Hernandez v. State, 825 So.2d 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Bingham v. State, 813 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Thames v. State, 769 So.2d 448 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Hampton v. State, 764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); and Macias v. State, 614 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA Affirmed; conflic......
- Vangunda v. State