Thaxton v. State, 34966

• Citation: 89 Ga.App. 536,80 S.E.2d 76
• Decision Date: 21 January 1954
• Docket Number: No. 34966,No. 2,34966,2
• Parties: THAXTON v. STATE
• Court: United States Court of Appeals (Georgia)

Page 76

80 S.E.2d 76

89 Ga.App. 536

THAXTON v. STATE.

No. 34966.

Court of Appeals of Georgia, Division No. 2.

Jan. 21, 1954.

Syllabus by the Court.

Where the verdict of guilty against a defendant in a criminal case is demanded by the evidence, with certain exceptions not here involved, errors committed on the trial are not harmful and reversible.

The defendant was indicted in the Superior Court of Henry County for assault with intent to murder one Roland Walker and one Larry Miller. The evidence, construed in its light most favorable to the defendant, demands a finding: that these two 17-year-old youths, residents of Mariana, Arkansas, and Memphis, Tenn. respectively, had hitchhiked to Tallahassee and were on their return journey home at the time they were shot by the defendant at about 11 p. m. on September 28, 1952; that the defendant lives on Highway U.S. 41 in Henry County and operates a service station on this highway located some 75 yards from the defendant's home; that, on the night the defendants shot the two young men, they were walking along this highway talking in loud voices to each other and using vulgar language within the hearing of the defendant and the female occupants of his household as well; and that the defendant without warning fired two or more shots from a shotgun in the direction of the voices. The defendant admitted these facts to be true. Both the victims were struck by shot and one lost an eye as a result thereof. An officer testified that the defendant told him that upon hearing the vulgar language he fired at some kind of yellow object. The defendant did not deny this testimony, and other undisputed evidence showed that one of the defendants wore a jacket or sweater that was partly yellow in color.

The defendant was convicted of shooting at another. He made a motion for new trial on the general grounds, which was later amended by adding four special grounds. The trial court denied the motion, and this judgment is assigned as error.

Reagan & Ellis, Thomas J. Brown, Jr., McDonough, W. J. Wallace, Roberta, for plaintiff in error.

Benjamin B. Garlan, Sol. Gen., Jackson, for defendant in error.

GARDNER, Presiding Judge.

With certain well-recognized exceptions, none of which are pertinent here, errors which occur in the course of a trial are not harmful and reversible where the verdict as rendered by the jury was demanded by the evidence. Williams v. State, 15 Ga.App. 311, 82 S.E. 817; Leonard v. State, 110 Ga. 291, 34 S.E. 1015. Shooting at another is defined by our Code as follows: 'Any person who shall be guilty of the offense of shooting at another, except in his own defense or under circumstances of justification, with a gun, pistol, or other instrument of the like kind, shall be punished by confinement in the penitentiary not less than one nor more than four years.' Code, § 26-1702. The evidence demands a finding that the shooting was not done by the defendant in his own defense, and on the question of whether or not it was done 'under [other] circumstances of justification' such as appear in Code, §§ 26-1011-1017, the indictment charged assault with intent to murder. It follows, therefore, that had the conviction been one of guilty of this offense, the defendant would have been equally guilty of murder if either of the victims had died as a result of the shooting. But since the conviction was...