The Florida Bar v. Chosid, 68157
| Decision Date | 05 January 1987 |
| Docket Number | No. 68157,68157 |
| Citation | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 72,500 So.2d 150 |
| Parties | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 72 THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Richard G. CHOSID, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Jacquelyn Plasner Needelman, Bar Counsel, Fort Lauderdale, for complainant.
Richard G. Chosid, Fort Lauderdale, in pro per.
This disciplinary proceeding is before us on complaint of The Florida Bar and the report of the referee. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.
The referee recommends that respondent be found guilty of violating article XI, Rule 11.02 of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, and Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(1), 1-102(A)(3), 1-102(A)(4), and 1-102(A)(6) of The Florida Bar Code of Professional Responsibility. These violations arose from respondent's guilty plea to the felony charge of making and subscribing a false income tax return. The referee recommended a three-year suspension, beginning November 1, 1984, and thereafter until respondent proves his rehabilitation. The Bar contends that the disciplinary sanction should be disbarment for a period of three years from April 24, 1985, the effective date of respondent's felony conviction.
We approve the referee's report, but find that, under these circumstances, the discipline must be a three-year suspension beginning April 24, 1985, and thereafter until respondent proves his rehabilitation. Judgment for costs in the amount of $365.53 is hereby entered against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.
It is so ordered.
Respondent was indicted by a grand jury in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, on five felony charges. The charges concerned the importing and distributing of marijuana and the concealment of monies from this operation for income tax purposes. Pursuant to a plea agreement, he pled guilty to one count of a five-count indictment, making and subscribing a false individual income tax return in violation of Title 26 Section 7206(1) United States Code. 1 The court accepted the guilty plea and adjudicated respondent guilty of a felony and sentenced him to a term of imprisonment for a period of two years and ordered him to pay a committed fine of $5,000.
Respondent has a history of prior discipline from The Florida Bar, albeit it was a minor one. He received a grievance level private reprimand growing out of charges of conflict of interest.
The referee recommended a three-year suspension. The Florida Bar has asked that respondent be disbarred for a period of three years from the effective date of his felony suspension. I agree with the bar's position.
I view respondent's offense as a very serious one. In making and subscribing a false income tax return, he has committed an act of perjury and he is guilty of conduct involving moral turpitude. His motivation for the crime was pecuniary gain by understating his taxable income. In short, this was stealing from the government. I do not believe that the identity of the victim of the theft should make a difference in the gravity of the offense and the bar discipline that should be imposed. If this theft had involved a client...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Fla. Bar v. Ratiner
...964 (Fla. 2009) ; Fla. Bar v. Norkin , 132 So.3d 77 (Fla. 2013) ; Fla. Bar v. Ratiner , 46 So.3d 35 (Fla. 2010) ; Fla. Bar v. Chosid , 500 So.2d 150 (Fla. 1987) ; Fla. Bar v. Vining , 761 So.2d 1044 (Fla. 2000) ; Fla. Bar v. Walkden , 950 So.2d 407 (Fla. 2007) ; Fla. Bar v. Rotstein , 835 S......
-
The Florida Bar v. Pavlick, 67793
...neither the Integration Rule nor case law mandates disbarment for all attorneys who are convicted of a felony. See The Florida Bar v. Chosid, 500 So.2d 150 (Fla.1987); The Florida Bar v. Carbonaro, 464 So.2d 549 (Fla.1985). Nor does the Integration Rule require a three-year suspension in su......
-
The Florida Bar v. Corbin, 71930
...Florida Bar v. Pavlick, 504 So.2d 1231, 1235 (Fla.1987). See also The Florida Bar v. Jahn, 509 So.2d 285 (Fla.1987); The Florida Bar v. Chosid, 500 So.2d 150 (Fla.1987); The Florida Bar v. Carbonaro, 464 So.2d 549 The Florida Bar, however, asserts that only disbarment is appropriate for a f......
-
The Florida Bar v. Smith
...Jahn, 509 So.2d 285, 286 (Fla.1987), we must "view each case solely on the merits presented therein." For instance, in The Florida Bar v. Chosid, 500 So.2d 150 (Fla.1987), the respondent, as did Smith, pleaded guilty to the felony charge of making and subscribing a false income tax return, ......