The Indianapolis v. Smith
| Decision Date | 30 June 1875 |
| Citation | The Indianapolis v. Smith, 78 Ill. 112, 1875 WL 8432 (Ill. 1875) |
| Parties | THE INDIANAPOLIS AND ST. LOUIS RAILROAD COMPANYv.GEORGE W. F. SMITH. |
| Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Madison county; the Hon. WILLIAM H. SNYDER, Judge, presiding. This was an action on the case, by the appellee, against the appellant, to recover damages for the killing of plaintiff's mule, by a train of cars, at a public road crossing.
The declaration contains three counts, the first of which charges that the injury was caused by a neglect to ring a bell or sound a whistle within eighty rods of the crossing, as required by law. The second alleges that the defendant allowed weeds and vegetation to grow on its track and right of way, at the place where the injury occurred, to such a height and density that defendant's servants could not operate and use its locomotive and trains of cars with safety to person and property, and that, in consequence of its negligence in this respect, the plaintiff's mule was killed. The third count avers generally that plaintiff's mule was killed in consequence of the negligence of the defendant in running its train.
The defendant filed the general issue, and a trial was had, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the value of the mule. The opinion of the court states the facts of the case sufficiently.
Mr. F. W. BURNETT, for the appellant.
Messrs. METCALF & BRADSHAW, for the appellee.
This action was brought to recover the value of a mule killed by a locomotive on appellant's road. No questions of law arise upon the record.
The mule had just escaped from the owner's inclosure, and was about to pass over the track, when it was struck by the engine, and killed. It was upon a crossing over a highway. At that point,...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Chandler v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.
...is danger, and the employees in charge may be enabled to discover whether there is anything on the track." Indianapolis & St. Louis R.R. Co. v. Smith, 78 Ill. 112, 114 (1875); see also Goodrich v. Sprague, 376 Ill. 80, 89, 32 N.E.2d 897 The third amended complaint reasonably informed Illino......
-
The Lake Erie v. Zoffinger
...brush to grow upon the right-of-way, so as to obstruct the view of the track: C. B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. Lee, 87 Ill. 454; I. & St. L. R. R. Co. v. Smith, 78 Ill. 112. Where two juries have passed upon the facts of a case with like result each time, the verdict will not be disturbed unless cle......
-
The Pa. Co. v. Frana
...of an approaching train was negligence on the part of appellee's employer and must be attributed to appellee himself: Indianapolis & St. L. R. R. Co. v. Smith, 78 Ill. 112; Rockford, R. I. & St. L. R. R. Co. v. Hillmer, 72 Ill. 235. An ordinance of the city has the same force and effect as ......
-
St. Louis v. Pflugmacher
...It was negligence in the company to permit bushes to grow upon its right-of-way so as to obstruct the view of the highway: I & St. L. R. R. Co. v. Smith, 78 Ill. 112. Negligence, when it consists in the omission of a duty imposed by positive requirement of law, is a question of law: Stratto......