The North American Petroleum Company v. Hopkins
Decision Date | 21 June 1919 |
Docket Number | 22,451 |
Parties | THE NORTH AMERICAN PETROLEUM COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD J. HOPKINS, as Attorney-general, etc., et al., as the THE STATE CHARTER BOARD, Defendants |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Decided January, 1919.
Original proceeding in mandamus.
SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.
FOREIGN CORPORATION--Requisites for Admission to Do Business in Kansas--Duty of Charter Board. A foreign corporation organized with shares of stock that are without any nominal or par value may be admitted to do business in this state and the charter board cannot lawfully refuse to make the inquiry concerning such corporation directed by section 2136 of the General Statutes of 1915, where the corporation in its application to do business in this state fully complies with section 2137 of the General Statutes of 1915.
John J. Jones, of Chanute, and E. L. Foulke, of Wichita, for the plaintiff.
Richard J. Hopkins, attorney-general, and S. N. Hawkes, assistant attorney-general, for the defendants.
The plaintiff, by mandamus, seeks to compel the defendants to consider the plaintiff's application to do business in this state as a foreign corporation. The petition alleges, among other things:
. . . .
"The plaintiff further alleges that it is entitled to do business in the state of Kansas as a foreign corporation and has complied with all the statutes of the state of Kansas on its part and with all the rules and regulations of the charter board of the state of Kansas.
. . . .
"That plaintiff further alleges that said defendants refuse to consider its said application for permission to do business as a foreign corporation in the state of Kansas wholly and solely upon the ground that, being a foreign corporation organized with no-par value stock, it could not be admitted as a foreign corporation under the laws of the state of Kansas."
The defendants have demurred to the petition, and the cause is heard on the demurrer. A consideration of section 2136 of the General Statutes of 1915 is necessary. That statute reads:
This statute declares that when the showing prescribed thereby has been made, the application shall be granted. The petition alleges facts which show that the plaintiff complied with this statute.
Section 2137 of the General Statutes of 1915 must also be considered. The section reads:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Pierce Petroleum Corporation
... ... North ... T. Gentry , Attorney-General, Claude E. Curtis , ... Special ... Petroleum ... Co., 250 S.W. 293; N. A. Petroleum Co. v ... Hopkins, 105 Kan. 161; Warren v. Bank, 149 Ill ... 25; Insurance Co. v ... value." [ American Uniform Co. v. Commonwealth, ... 237 Mass. 42.] ... ...
-
Chicago, M., St. P. & P.R. Co. v. Harmon
... ... Paul & Pacific Railroad ... Company against W. E. Harmon, as Secretary of State. Judgment ... comity between the states ( American Christian Union v ... Yount, 101 U.S. 352, 25 L.Ed ... the jurisdiction. North American Petroleum Co. v ... Hopkins, 105 Kan. 161, 181 ... ...
-
Johnson v. Louisville Trust Co.
... ... The ... Louisville Trust Company, as trustee for certain individuals, ... had purchased at ... have been held qualified to do business. Petroleum Co. v ... State Charter Board, 105 Kan. 161, 181 P. 625; ... three valuable and interesting articles in the American Bar ... Association Journal upon the subject of no par ... ...
-
Staples v. Kirby Petroleum Co.
...of which the charter was granted became a part of the charter. The Supreme Court of Kansas held to the contrary. N. A. Petroleum Co. v. Hopkins, 105 Kan. 161, 181 Pac. 625. In State ex rel. v. Sullivan, 282 Mo. 261, 221 S. W. 728, which involved the question of franchise tax, the Supreme Co......