the Prudential Insurance Co., of America v. Croley
Decision Date | 08 January 1940 |
Docket Number | 4-5723 |
Citation | 135 S.W.2d 322,199 Ark. 630 |
Parties | THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. CROLEY |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Garland Circuit Court; Earl Witt, Judge; affirmed.
Affirmed.
Ralph W. Hyatt and Rose, Loughborough, Dobyns & House, for appellant.
Martin Wootton & Martin, for appellee.
Appellee is the. named beneficiary in a policy of life insurance issued by appellant on the life of Sanford Croley in the principal sum of $ 1,000. Said policy contained a provision for double indemnity in event of the death of the insured by accidental means, as defined therein. On October 11, 1937, the insured was injured as the result of an automobile accident near Deming, New Mexico, on a cold rainy day, and was taken to a hospital in Deming, about an hour after the accident, after being exposed to the inclement weather. He died with lobar pneumonia eight days later on October 19, 1937. Proof of death was made and appellant paid the principal sum of $ 1,000, but refused to pay under the double indemnity clause, and this suit followed to collect the additional sum of $ 1,000, with interest, penalty, and attorneys' fees.
Appellant defended on the ground that the death of the insured did not result, directly or indirectly, through bodily injury, nor was it effected solely through external, violent and accidental means. It relied on the provisions of the double indemnity clause that such benefits shall not be payable if death results, directly or indirectly, from bodily or mental infirmity or disease in any form, and asserted that the insured, in violation of instructions, shortly after entering the hospital, exposed himself to the elements a second time, and, as a result, contracted pneumonia from which he died. Trial before the court, sitting as a jury, resulted in a judgment for appellee, hence this appeal.
The policy contains this clause:
For a reversal of the judgment against it appellant insists that the insured did not die of bodily injuries. It concedes that there were bodily injuries and a visible contusion on the exterior of the body, but it is insisted that such injuries had nothing to do with the death of the insured. This argument is based on the testimony of Dr. Colvard who treated insured in the hospital in Deming. His testimony is summarized in a letter to T. H. Malone, manager of the Adjustment Bureau, El Paso, Texas, which was introduced by agreement and treated as his deposition, and is as follows:
Dear Sir:
Dr Colvard testified by deposition in addition to the foregoing letter, and the substance of all his...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Travelers Insurance Co. v. Johnston
...... National Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. Shibley, 192 Ark. 53, 90 S.W.2d 766; Prudential. Ins. Co. v. Croley, 199 Ark. 630, 135 S.W.2d. 322. . . Counsel. for ......
-
Travelers Ins. Co. v. Johnston
...... Suit by Roy M. Johnston against the Travelers Insurance Company to recover on two accident policies. From a judgment in favor of ...Co. v. Shibley, 192 Ark. 53, 90 S.W.2d 766; Prudential Ins. Co. v. Croley, 199 Ark. 630, 135 S.W.2d 322. Counsel ......
-
Life & Cas. Ins. Co. of Tenn. v. Jones
...... filed these actions to recover from appellant, Life and Casualty Insurance Company of Tennessee, as beneficiary under two policies of insurance ... and within the continental land boundaries of the United States of America and not on a boat, ship or other watercraft wherever located, there shall ...Co. v. Shibley, 192 Ark. 53, 90 S.W.2d 766; Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Croley, 199 Ark. 630, 135 S.W.2d 322; ......
-
Wood v. Valley Forge Life Ins. Co.
......Smith Family Trust # 2, Appellant,. v. VALLEY FORGE LIFE INSURANCE Company, Appellee. No. 06-2193. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth ...v. Jones, 230 Ark. 979, 985-86, 328 S.W.2d 118, 121-22 (1959); Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Croley, 199 Ark. 630, 632-35, 135 S.W.2d 322, 324 ......