The State v. Adams
Decision Date | 20 December 1926 |
Docket Number | 27481 |
Citation | 289 S.W. 948,316 Mo. 157 |
Parties | The State v. Everett Adams, Appellant |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Pettis Circuit County; Hon. Dimmitt Hoffman Judge.
Affirmed.
North T. Gentry, Attorney-General, and James A. Potter, Assistant Attorney-General, for respondent.
(1) The information is in the language of the statute and is therefore sufficient. Sec. 3230, R. S. 1919; State v Rasco, 239 Mo. 535; State v. Bacey, 267 S.W 809. The information purports to contain two counts, but they both relate to the same transaction and to the same crime, and evidence in support of count number two was admissible under count one. State v. Brown, 119 Mo. 527. (2) The verdict was general, but under the evidence and pleadings was sufficient. Where different counts are based on the same crime, involved in the same transaction, and defined in the same statute, a general verdict is sufficient. State v. Pace, 269 Mo. 681; State v. Evertz, 202 S.W. 614; State v. Bray, 246 S.W. 921. The second count in the information was wholly unnecessary, as evidence in support thereof was admissible under count one. State v. Brown, 119 Mo. 527; State v. Meyers, 99 Mo. 112; State v. Foster, 136 Mo. 653. (3) The manner of summoning the jury is relatively unimportant if the jurors summoned are competent. State v. Clinger, 46 Mo. 224; State v. Ward, 74 Mo. 253; State v. Matthews, 88 Mo. 121; State v. Wiley, 109 Mo. 439; State v. Breen, 59 Mo. 413; State v. Riddle, 179 Mo. 287. (4) Defendant made numerous objections to his trial in the circuit court, on the ground that the case should have been submitted first to the juvenile court. The evidence shows that the defendant was sixteen years of age on August 1, 1925; that he became seventeen years of age on August 10, 1925; that he was first formally charged with the crime on August 12, 1925, two days after he became seventeen years of age. The court will take judicial notice of the fact that Pettis County contains less than 50,000 inhabitants. The procedure is governed by Sections 1136, 1141 and 1136 Laws 1923, page 131. Under these sections the defendant was properly tried in the criminal division of the circuit court. Secs. 1136, 1141, R. S. 1919; Laws 1923, p. 131. (5) The written confession of defendant was admissible under the testimony of the State's witnesses. State v. Lee, 288 Mo. 41; State v. Hart, 292 Mo. 74; State v. McNeal, 237 S.W. 738; State v. Meyer, 293 Mo. 108; State v. Brown, 267 S.W. 871. (6) The testimony concerning defendant's trouble with a girl at Wilmington, Ohio, was admissible. The first statement referring to this matter came into the trial without any objection on the part of the defendant. The next reference came into the case as a part of defendant's confession. Defendant made no objection to this particular part of his confession, but objected only to the confession as a whole. The next reference to this matter came into the case in the defendant's letter written to his parents while in jail. No objection was made to the introduction of this letter. Defendant's counsel in his opening statement to the jury stated to the jury that defendant did not have any trouble with a girl in Ohio, and that the defendant would prove that to be true. The defendant put on several character witnesses who testified on this point, and in the cross-examination of these witnesses the State properly inquired as to rumors concerning the defendant's conduct at Wilmington. The court undertook to confine the evidence within legitimate channels, but defendant's counsel insisted that the court let down the barriers and permit wide latitude in the admission of evidence bearing on this question. Under these circumstances the defendant is in no position to complain of erroneous admission of testimony in this connection, and having invited the error, cannot now complain, if error was committed. State v. Jackson, 99 Mo. 60; State v. Frazier, 137 Mo. 317; State v. Sasseen, 75 Mo.App. 197; State v. Palmer, 161 Mo. 152; State v. Goddard, 162 Mo. 198; State v. Hamey, 168 Mo. 167; State v. Jones, 171 Mo. 401; State v. Woodward, 182 Mo. 391; State v. Daugherty, 287 Mo. 82; State v. Stewart, 296 Mo. 12; State v. Mahan, 267 S.W. 866.
RAILEY
On August 24, 1925, the Prosecuting Attorney of Pettis County, filed in the circuit court of said county, a verified information in two counts, charging defendant in the first count with murder in the first degree in the killing of Aden R. Clawson, in Pettis County, Missouri, on the first day of August, 1925; and in the second count charging said defendant with murder in the first degree, on the above date in said county, while perpetrating a robbery from the person of said Clawson. Both counts of the information were submitted to the jury, and the latter, on October 10, 1925, returned the following verdict:
"We, the jury, find the defendant guilty of murder in the first degree and assess his punishment at life imprisonment."
Thereafter, defendant filed his motion for a new trial, which was overruled, allocution granted, judgment rendered and sentence pronounced in conformity with said verdict.
The transcript of the evidence in this case covers about 275 pages. The appellant has filed no brief in this court. Assistant Attorney-General Potter has made a fair, clear and full statement of the facts as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Barbata
...and assess the punishment at death, Frank S. Winter, Foreman --" is sufficient. [State v. Jackson (Mo.), 253 S.W. 734, l. c. 737; State v. Adams, 316 Mo. 157, c. 164, 289 S.W. 948; State v. Baublits, 324 Mo. 1199, l. c. 1207, 27 S.W.2d 16; State v. Long (Mo.), 253 S.W. 729, l. c. 733.] Assi......
-
State v. Nasello
... ... the usual and common form. [ State v. Meyers, 99 Mo ... 107, 12 S.W. 516; State v. Brown, 119 Mo. 527, 24 ... S.W. 1027, 25 S.W. 200; State v. Foster, 136 Mo ... 653, 38 S.W. 721; State v. Peak, 292 Mo. 249, 237 ... S.W. 466; State v. Adams, 316 Mo. 157, 289 S.W ... 948.] Proof that defendant and others conspired together to ... commit an unlawful act and that the killing occurred while ... carrying out the conspiracy may also be shown under such an ... indictment or information. [ State v. Carroll, 288 ... Mo. 392, 232 S.W ... ...
-
State v. Baublits
...under the authority of State v. Bass, 251 Mo. 107, cited by the appellant. (6) Instruction 4a follows a long line of precedents. State v. Adams, 289 S.W. 948; State v. Johnson, 316 Mo. 86, 289 S.W. State v. Hamilton, 304 Mo. 19, 263 S.W. 127; State v. Haynes, 262 S.W. 1034; State v. Davis, ......
-
State v. King
...v. White, 330 Mo. 737, 51 S.W.2d 109; State v. Messino, 325 Mo. 743, 30 S.W.2d 750; State v. Nasello, 325 Mo. 442, 30 S.W.2d 132; State v. Adams, 289 S.W. 948. (2) corpus delicti was shown in this case. State v. Click, 57 S.W.2d 1077; State v. McGuire, 327 Mo. 1176, 39 S.W.2d 523; State v. ......