"I
John N. Dakin, being sworn, say that I am defendant; that I
cannot safely proceed to trial at the present term by reason
of the absence of material witnesses; that the names of said
witnesses are Joseph Dakin, Harriet Dakin, Edward Dakin and
Andrew Dakin; that their present whereabouts are unknown to
me; that they resided until very recently in Liberty
township, Marshall county, Iowa and had resided in said
township nearly two years, and in said county nearly twenty
years; that said Harriet Dakin is wife of said Joseph Dakin,
and said Edward and Andrew are their sons, and residing all
in one family; that they removed from said Liberty township
on or about the 14th day of October, 1878, with the
intention, as I am informed and believe, to go to Jewell
county, Kan.; that their intention to so remove before the
present term of this court was not known to me; that I did
not learn or know or have any information of their departure
or intention to depart before the present term of this court
until the morning of Saturday, Oct. 26, 1878, when I first
learned they had gone; that I saw and conversed for a moment
with said Joseph a short time before he went away, in the
presence of several parties, at the door of the jail in this
county, through the wicket; that I had opportunity to do no
more than barely speak to him, and told him I would want him
as a witness on the trial of the case; he replied that the
case would not be tried here and that he would not be needed
at the next term of this court: that it was then my intention, and I believe he knew of it, to apply for
a change of venue; that I didn't then know whether my
trial would come at this term of the court, and didn't
know or expect he intended to leave here immediately and
before this court would convene; that I didn't have said
witness subpoenaed because I didn't then know whether
said cause would be tried at this term of court or when it
would be tried, and because I supposed that as they resided
in the county I could procure their attendance upon a few
hours notice, and because I expected my application for a
change of venue would be granted; that I was surprised my
application for said change of venue was refused by the
court, and that my trial would come on this term, and because
of all said matters I didn't have subpoenas issued for
said witnesses.
"That
I expect to prove by said witnesses, Edward and Andrew, the
following facts: On the evening of the alleged murder of John
K. Stough they were at my barn looking for a horse that had
formerly been owned by me, and which they expected to find at
my barn, and that on their return I accompanied them together
to their father's house, a distance of about five miles
from my residence, and from the place where the body of John
K. Stough was found the next morning; that in company with
them I started on horseback--all on horseback--from my barn
early in the evening, at or before eight o'clock; that we
went out directly to their father's, Joseph Dakin's,
house; that I remained there a few minutes for the purpose of
seeing if I could purchase a horse from Joseph, and between
eight or nine o'clock--nine probably--near nine, I left
his house; that when they came to my barn that I was there at
the barn and was preparing to go to Joseph Dakin's,
getting my horse ready for that purpose, and that my wife was
there with me at the time; that I expect to prove said facts
by each of said witnesses and do not know of any other
witness or witnesses by whom I can prove the same facts,
except that I can prove by my wife that I was at the barn
when they came, and by Joseph Dakin and his wife that I was
at their house.
"That
I expect to prove by Joseph Dakin that between the hours of
eight and nine o'clock of the evening of the night on which John K. Stough was killed, I was...